What the hell are they spraying on us? PART 8

An earlier version of this report was published at Global Research. Below is the revised version.

A review of “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies”

By Rady Ananda

At an international symposium held in Ghent, Belgium May 28-30, 2010, scientists asserted that “manipulation of climate through modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy theory.” It is “fully operational” with a solid sixty-year history. Though “hostile” environmental modification was banned by UN Convention in 1978, its “friendly” use today is being hailed as the new savior to climate change and to water and food shortages. Military forces stand poised to capitalize on controlling the world’s weather.

“In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.”

~World Meteorological Organization, 2007

The only conspiracy surrounding geoengineering is that most governments and industry refuse to publicly admit what anyone with eyes can see. Peer-reviewed research is available to anyone willing and able to maneuver the labyrinth of scientific journals. So, while there is some disclosure on the topic, full public explanation is lacking. A brief list of confirmed cloud seeding events is produced at bottom, starting in 1915.

Going under a variety of names – atmospheric geoengineering, weather modification, solar radiation management, chemical buffering, cloud seeding, weather force multiplication – toxic aerial spraying is popularly known as chemtrails. However, this is merely one technique employed to modify weather. The practice of environmental modification is vast and well funded.

Hosted by the Belfort Group, which has been working for the last seven years to raise public awareness of toxic aerial spraying, the Symposium included chemtrail awareness groups from Greece, Germany, Holland, France and the U.S.  Belfort published five videos covering only May 29,[1] when filmmaker Michael Murphy (Environmental Deception and What in the world are they spraying)[2] and aerospace engineer Dr. Coen Vermeeren [3] gave the most dramatic presentations.

Dr Vermeeren, of the Delft University of Technology, presented [4] a 300-page scientific report entitled, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” [5]

Case Orange notes it was prepared for the Belfort Group by a team of scientists but presented anonymously. It was sent to embassies, news organizations and interested groups around the world “to force public debate.”

The report spends some time on HAARP, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, [6] which is a military endeavor focused on manipulation of the ionosphere, magnetosphere and atmosphere, and on other exotic weapon systems that manipulate the environment. While related, they go beyond this discussion of chemtrails.

In the interest of brevity, the health and environmental implications of cloud seeding is not discussed in any depth herein. Case Orange does go into it, as did most of the speakers at the Belfort Symposium. Cursory research reveals a debate among researchers as to chemtrail toxicity, but whether that’s a 50-50 or 99-1 argument is unknown.

Contrails Are Chemtrails

Case Orange rejects use of the term ‘chemtrails’ because it is associated with amateur conspiracy theorists. The only credible document it could find that uses it is the Space Preservation Act of 2001 introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). [7]  H.R. 2977 sought to ban the use of exotic weapon systems that would damage climate, weather, tectonic and biological systems. “Chemtrails” are specifically listed. Though later removed, no version of the bill ever became law.

Instead, the writers prefer the term ‘persistent contrails’ to describe the phenomenon since all contrails are chemtrails. ‘Persistent contrails’ distinguishes those that contain weather-altering additives from those that represent normal aircraft exhaust that dissipates after a few seconds or minutes.

Case Orange also rejects misanthropic intentions behind persistent contrails on the assumptions that 1) public health agencies have the public interest at heart; and 2) the economy is consumer driven. The authors indicate no awareness of numerous reports of collusion between the pharmaceutical industry and government health agencies. This year, a significant conflict-of-interest report appeared in the prestigious British Medical Journal, which further heightened suspicions that the H1N1 flu and its vaccines were a scam.[8]  Nor do the authors consider that sick people will spur economic growth in a capitalist (for profit) health system.

Dr. Vermeeren gave his own introductory remarks and conclusions, but spent the bulk of the hour presenting information from Case Orange. He frankly admitted the existence of persistent contrails.

“We also know that chemtrails do exist because we do spraying; for crops, for example, and we know that they have been spraying for military purposes. So, chemtrails is nothing new. We know about it.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LISTEN TO Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech, Afternoon Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins.)  http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427

DOWNLOAD the “CASE ORANGE” Report (PDF without appendices)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Weather manipulation through contrail formation … is in place and fully operational.”

Case Orange cites publicly available material that shows geoengineering has been ongoing for “at least 60 years.” Used as a weapon of war in Hamburg by the UK during World War II, it was also used in the Vietnam Conflict by the US.  Controversy over its use, revealed by investigative reporter Jack Anderson, spurred Senate hearings in 1972. During those hearings, military officials denied the use of cloud seeding technology. Later, a private letter from Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird surfaced, admitting that his testimony was false. He, again unbelievably, claimed he didn’t know what was happening. [9]

Environmental modification (EnMod) weaponry was finally banned by treaty in 1978. The UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques forced the end of such programs, overtly anyway.[10]  (Case Orange authors seem unaware of this international ban, as it is one of their recommendations.)

However, with widespread reporting of rising global temperatures, increasing population, and degradation of water supplies, renewed interest in EnMod is now becoming broadly supported. (See, e.g., Top economists recommend climate engineering, 4 Sep 2009 [11] and similarly, Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’, 1 Sep 2009.[12])

Building a case for old technology finding a new market, Case Orange discusses several U.S. patents. For example, authors describe a 1975 patent, “Powder Contrail Generation,” [13] for the invention of a:

“specific contrail generation apparatus for producing a powder contrail having maximum radiation scattering ability for a given weight [of] material. The seeding material … consists of 85% metallic particles and 15% colloidal Silica and Silica gel in order to produce a stable contrail that has a residence period of 1 up to 2 weeks.”

In 2009, researchers published “Modification of Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” which proposed two methods of delivery for this same proportion of metallics to silica and the same staying power of one to two weeks.[14]

Case Orange also reveals a 1991 patent held by Hughes Aircraft Company [15] that:

“contains 18 claims to reduce global warming through stratospheric seeding with aluminum oxide… thorium oxide … and refractory Welsbach material ….”

The report notes that “the proposed scenario by the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] in 2001 is identical to the claims” in Hughes Aircraft’s 1991 patent. Hughes was acquired by Raytheon, a private defense contractor, in 1997, “the same company that acquired E-systems and the HAARP contract.”

Case Orange presents evidence that Raytheon stands to control all weather, which the authors find repugnant given that it is a private corporation. The authors recommend suing private corporations instead of governments. But subcontracting is quite common for governments and agencies, especially the US military. The distinction between large, powerful corporations and governments is a fine line obscure to common folk. And, the effect is the same whether governments are spraying us with nano-sized metals, chemicals or biologicals, or whether corporations do. The authors’ protective posture toward governments is nonsensical.

Case Orange suggests that geoengineering found new life in the global warming scare. Old patents are being dusted off and private interests stand to make substantial sums now that Cap and Trade has been exposed as ineffective in reducing greenhouse gases. (Although, lawmakers are still considering it since much can be earned on the scheme, to wit: Al Gore reportedly achieved billionaire status from it.)

Since 2007, billionaire Bill Gates has spent at least $4.5 million on geoengineering research. [16]  Since reducing emissions is not popular with industry, ‘Plan B’ – geoengineering – is being touted as the answer to climate change and water shortage.  A longer description of Plan B is: Add more pollution to the sky and water to offset the deleterious effects of  industrial pollution, without reducing industrial pollution.

Human rights and environmental watchdog, ETC Group, describes the momentum [17]:

“The roll-out of geoengineering as Plan B is being skillfully executed: prominent high-level panels sponsored by prestigious groups, a spate of peer-reviewed articles this January in science journals, and a line-up of panicked politicians in northern countries, nodding nervously in agreement as scientists testify about the ‘need to research Plan B.’”

ETC reports that Gates’ top geoengineering advisor unveiled a plan to grow solar radiation management research “one-hundred-fold, from $10 million to $1 billion over ten years.”

Indeed, several watchdog groups recently ramped up calls to address clean water shortage. “At the end of July 2010, the United Nations General Assembly will vote on an important resolution, initiated by the Bolivian government, which would make clean water and sanitation a human right,” reports Food and Water Watch.[18]  This year, National Geographic and Yes! Magazine dedicated entire issues to water.

~~~

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025

Case Orange ties a 1996 report by top military personnel in the U.S., “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” [19] to evidentiary details (like governmental spraying schedules, chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operating manuals, and calls for geoengineering by economists) to support its notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate control projects.”

Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific timeline for the use of EnMod technologies in cooperation with the Weather Modification Association (WMA), a business-government group promoting the beneficial uses of environmental modification [20]:  (Here is a link to a downloadable full version pdf of the declassified report:)  http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf  

2000 Introduce ionic mirrors, with a sharp increase from 2008;

2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as well as military) aviation;

2004 Create smart clouds thru nanotechnology, with exponential increase after 2010;

2005 Introduce ‘carbon black dust’.

Though Case Orange decries the paucity of research into EnMod, in 2009 Weather Modification Assn. published its position statement on the safety of seeding clouds with silver-iodide, citing three dozen research papers from 1970 through 2006. [21]

In 2007, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) published its position statement that included “Guidelines for the Planning of Weather Modification Activities.” Acknowledging that the modern technology of weather modification began in the 1940s, WMO asserts it is still “an emerging technology” today. [22] WMO indicated disappointment that research is being abandoned for operations.

Case Orange contains no reference to the WMA position statement citing all that research, although it cites the group. Nor does it mention the World Meteorological Organization, an agency of the United Nations, which has a link to its Weather Modification portal on its Index page.

At the end of the section, The bare necessity of geoengineering through cloud generation for survival of the planet (5.2.7), Case Orange states:

“[O]ur investigation team comes to the conclusion that climate control programs, controlled by the military but approved by governments, are silently implemented in order to avoid the worst case scenarios they obviously do not want. The two basic instruments are temperature control through generation of artificial clouds and manipulation of the ionosphere through ionosphere heaters.

“Both remain basically military combat systems with the option to go into the offensive if deemed necessary. However since several ionosphere heaters are installed on various places around the globe one can assume that there is wide cooperation between governments in order to reach the climate targets by 2025: controlling the weather and thus the planet.”

The report published the following images provided by a former meteorologist at the Ontario Weather Service, showing spraying schemes for Europe. For December 6, 2008:

In the next series of images covering January 3-5, 2010, the authors assert that “The spraying schemes seem to be organized in a logical pattern so that the whole of Europe is covered in a 3-day period”:

Case Orange agrees that climate change needs to be addressed. Regarding Climate-Gate, the authors suggest that the University of East Anglia deliberately manipulated the climate data to gradually prepare the global population for its future on a hotter planet.

They also cite research that supports the notion that climate change is real. During the three-day grounding of most aircraft after 9/11, scientists noticed an increase in temperature of 1.1 °C (2 °F). [23] This is an astounding increase in such a short time frame. The incidence of cloud seeding reports by the public increases exponentially after this.

The 1996 military piece, Owning the Weather in 2025, gives climate change skeptics “an insight in what to expect in the 21st century:

‘Current demographic, economic and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn weather modfication ability into capability. In the United States weather modification will likely become part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.’”

~~~

Recommendations

“Persistent contrails,” however, “have a devastating impact on eco-systems on this planet and quality of life in general.” Case Orange joins the call of Bill Gates’ geoengineering advisor and the WMO for new research measuring the impact on human health and the environment from EnMod programs.

Case Orange also recommends an immediate and full disclosure of current EnMod activities to the public; and that all civil aviation laws be abided.

Of note, in response to policy interest in geoengineering as a means to control climate change and enhance water supplies, on May 14, 2010, the science subcommittee of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity proposed a geoengineering moratorium. [24] This proposed ban on “friendly” EnMod programs will be heard at the Tenth Conference of Parties to UN Convention on Biodiversity in Nagoya, Japan this October.

Case Orange reports that China and Russia openly admit to cloud-seeding, while the U.S. denies such activities. The U.S. does permit open air testing of chemical and biological weapons but not under the law the authors cited, which they paraphrased:

The secretary of defense may conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological agents on civilian populations.

Public law of the United States, Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977.

Codified as 50 USC 1520, under Chapter 32 Chemical and Biological Warfare Program, Public Law 95-79 was repealed in 1997 by Public Law 105-85. In its place, 15 USC 1520a provides restrictions (such as informed consent). 50 USC 1512, however, allows open air testing of chemicals and biologicals and allows presidential override of notices and of public health considerations for national security reasons. [25] Case Orange authors are thus correct, it seems, in asserting that such programs are legal, if reprehensible, in the U.S.

Conclusion

For centuries, military leaders have recognized that it rains after a heavy battle. But harnessing that power in a way that doesn’t cause a deluge like in San Diego in 1915 has been a task. (See Brief History, below.) The historical record has many such stories: misdirected hurricanes, farm wars, massive flooding and mudslides. Eventually, though, science met the challenge.

If its birth can be marked by Britain’s successful use of chaff in 1943 to jam enemy radar, the modern environmental modification program is 67 years old. We saw its military use in Vietnam in the 1960s. China openly used it in 2008 to clear the skies for the Olympics.

In 1978, world leaders addressed the moral and ecological issues of using such technologies as a weapon of war by banning their use.  Almost thirty years later, in 2007, the World Meteorological Organization complained that EnMod funds were moving from research into operations. Three years later, in May of this year, the United Nations proposed the ban of EnMod operations, calling for further research.

Even with a couple obvious holes in research, the Case Orange report is essentially correct: officials are spraying the skies, and they’re not fully disclosing these activities. Corporate media is colluding with officials in keeping these operations secret from the public.

But, the public has a right to know and governments have a duty to fully disclose all environmental modification operations. The impacts on our health and environment need to be fully understood, and informed consent from the populace needs to be a part of any EnMod operation.

~~~

A Brief History of Cloud Seeding

Cloud seeding, as a US military research project, began as early as the 1830s, according to Colby College professor, James R. Fleming. [26]  Verifiably successful rainmaking attempts did not occur until 1915.

1915 To end a prolonged drought, San Diego hired reputed rainmaker Charles Hatfield, who claimed that the evaporation of his secret chemical brew atop wooden towers could attract clouds.  San Diego was rewarded with a 17-day deluge that totaled 28 inches. The deadly downpour washed out more than 100 bridges, made roads impassable over a huge area, destroyed communications lines, and left thousands homeless. [27]

1943 “The first operational use of chaff (aluminium strips which are precisely cut to a quarter of the radar’s wavelength) took place in July 1943, when [the British Royal Air Force subjected Hamburg] to a devastating bombing raid. The radar screens were cluttered with reflections from the chaff and the air defence was, in effect, completely blinded.” [28]

1946 General Electric’s Vincent Schaefer dropped six pounds of dry ice into a cold cloud over Greylock Peak in the Berkshires, causing an “explosive” growth of three miles in the cloud. [29]

1947 Australian meteorologists successfully repeated the process. [30]

1949 Project Cirrus: From a desert near Albuquerque, Nobel Laureate Irving Langmuir and General Electric researcher Vincent Schaefer fed ten ounces of silver iodide into a blowtorch apparatus and brought down 320 billion gallons of rain across half of New Mexico. [31]

1950 Harvard meteorologist Wallace Howell seeded New York City skies with dry ice and silver iodide smoke, filling the city’s reservoirs to near capacity. [32]

1952 The UK’s Operation Cumulus resulted in 250 times the normal amount of rainfall, killing dozens and destroying landscapes. [33]

1962-1983 Operation Stormfury, a hurricane modification program, had some success in reducing winds by up to 30%. [34]

1966-1972 Project Intermediary Compatriot (later called Pop Eye) successfully seeded clouds in Laos. The technique became part of military actions in Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos from 1967 to 1972. Initially revealed by Jack Anderson in the Washington Post, 18 Mar 1971. [35]

1986 The Soviet air force diverted Chernobyl fallout from reaching Moscow by seeding clouds. Belarus, instead, was hit with the toxic fallout. [36]

2008 Chinese government used 1,104 cloud seeding missiles to remove the threat of rain ahead of the Olympic opening ceremony in Beijing. [37]

2009 Moscow Halo. Case Orange cites this as evidence of cloud seeding, but others suspect it is electromagnetic in origin. Russian authorities said it was an optical illusion. [38]

This is by no means a comprehensive list; indeed, volumes are dedicated to the subject.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Notes:

[1] Belfort Group videos of International Symposium on Chemtrails, May 29, 2010 proceedings. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/belfort-test

[2] Michael Murphy website: http://truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com/

[3] Dr Coen Vermeeren, Delft University of Technology bio, n.d. (Translated from Dutch to English by Google): http://snipurl.com/10oirj

[4] Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech, Afternoon Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins..) (29 May 2010) http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427

[5] Anonymous, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies,” 10 May 2010. PDF without appendices: http://coto2.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/case_orange-5-10-2010-belfort-chemtrails.pdf

[6] High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, Fact Sheet, 15 Jun 2007. http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/factSheet.html

[7] Space Preservation Act of 2001, H.R.2977, 107^th Congress, 1^st Session. Introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich.

[8] Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter, “Conflicts of Interest: WHO and the pandemic ‘flu conspiracies,’” British Medical Journal 2010;340:c2912, 3 Jun 2010. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/jun03_4/c2912

[9] The Sunshine Project, “The Limits of Inside Pressure: The US Congress Role in ENMOD,” n.d. Accessed July 2010. http://www.sunshine-project.org/enmod/US_Congr.html

[10] United Nations, “Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques,” Resolution 31/72, 10 Dec 1976, effective 1978. Geneva. http://www.un-documents.net/enmod.htm

[11] Copenhagen Consensus Center, “Top economists recommend climate engineering,” 4 Sep 2009. Press release [pdf] http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fPress+Releases+2010%2fCC_PRESS_STATEMENT__4september2010_.pdf

[12] Catherine Brahic, “Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’,” New Scientist, 1 Sep 2009. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17716-top-science-body-calls-for-geoengineering-plan-b.html

[13] Donald K. Werle, et al., “Powder contrail generation,” U.S. Patent 3,899,144, 12 Aug 1975. Assignee: U.S. Secretary of the Navy. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3,899,144.PN.&OS=PN/3,899,144&RS=PN/3,899,144

[14] David L Mitchell and William Finnegan, “Modification of Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” Environmental Research Letters Vol. 4 No. 4, 30 Oct 2009. Available by subscription: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/4/045102

[15] David B. Chang and I-Fu Shih, “Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming,” U.S. Patent 5,003,186, 26 Mar 1991. Assignee: Hughes Aircraft Company. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,003,186.PN.&OS=PN/5,003,186&RS=PN/5,003,186

[16] Eli Kintisch, “Bill Gates Funding Geoengineering Research,” Science Insider, 26 Jan 2010. http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/01/bill-gates-fund.html.

[17] ETC Group, “Top-down Planet Hackers Call for Bottom-up Governance: Geoengineers’ Bid to Establish Voluntary Testing Regime Must Be Opposed,” 11 Feb 2010. http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/5073

[18] Food and Water Watch: http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/water/world-water/right/

[19] Col Tamzy J. House, et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,” Department of Defense U.S. Air Force, 17 Jun 1996. Publicly released August 1996. Reproduced at Federation of American Scientists: http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm

[20] Weather Modicaton Association website: http://www.weathermodification.org/

[21] Weather Modification Association, “Position Statement on the Environmental Impact of Using Silver Iodides as a Cloud Seeding Agent,” July 2009. http://www.weathermodification.org/AGI_toxicity.pdf

[22] World Meteorological Organization, “WMO Statement on Weather Modification,” UN Commission for Atmospheric Sciences Management Group, 26 Sep 2007. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/WM_statement_guidelines_approved.pdf

[23] Donald J. Travis, et al. “Contrails reduce daily temperature range,” Nature 418, 601, 8 Aug 2002. Reproduced by University of Washington, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences: http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~rennert/etc/courses/pcc587/ref/Travis-etal2002_Nature.pdf

[24] Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, “In-depth Review of the Work on Biodiversity and Climate Change, Draft Recommendation,” Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP/CBD/SBTTA/14/L.9, 15 May 2010. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-14/in-session/sbstta-14-L-09-en.pdf

[25] United States Code, Title 50, Chapter 32, “Chemical and Biological Warfare Program.” http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/50C32.txt

[26] James Rodger Fleming, “The pathological history of weather and climate modification: Three cycles of promise and hype,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2006. Available at http://www.colby.edu/sts/06_fleming_pathological.pdf

[27] Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American Heritage, 2005. http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml

[28] Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese, “The History of Radar,” BBC, 14 Jul 2003. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A591545

[29] Fleming, citing New York Times, 15 Nov 1946, 24.

[30] Squires, P. & Smith, E. J., “The Artificial Stimulation of Precipitation by Means of Dry Ice,” Australian Journal of Scientific Research, Series A: Physical Sciences, vol. 2, p.232, 1949AuSRA…2..232S, 1949. Republished at Harvard University: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1949AuSRA…2..232S/0000244.000.html

Also see: Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American Heritage, 2005. http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml

[31]  Life Magazine, “Solution to Water Shortage: Rain makers’ success shows how New York could fill its reservoirs,” p. 113, 20 Feb 1950. http://snipurl.com/10oir8

[32] Life Magazine, “U.S. Water: We can supplement our outgrown sources at a price,” 21 Aug 1950, p. 52. http://snipurl.com/10oirc

[33] John Vidal and Helen Weinstein, “RAF rainmakers ’caused 1952 flood’: Unearthed documents suggest experiment triggered torrent that killed 35 in Devon disaster,” The Guardian, 30 Aug 2001. http://www.guardian.co.uk/silly/story/0,10821,544259,00.html

Also see: BBC News, “Rain-making link to killer floods,” 30 Aug 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1516880.stm

[34] Jerry E. Smith, “Weather Warfare: The Military’s Plan to Draft Mother Nature,” Adventures Unlimited Press, 2006. pp. 47-54. http://snipurl.com/10oiqw

[35] ibid. pp. 54-60.

[36] Richard Gray, “How we made the Chernobyl rain,” Daily Telegraph, 22 Apr 2007. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1549366/How-we-made-the-Chernobyl-rain.html

[37] Ian O’Neill, “The Chinese ‘Weather Manipulation Missile’ Olympics,” Universe Today, 12 Aug 2008. http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/12/the-chinese-weather-manipulation-missile-olympics/

[38] Anonymous, “Moscow Halo,” cell phone video uploaded to YouTube, 7 Oct 2009. reposted at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXF9HSB627U

 

Churchill Advisor Revealed Illuminati Thinking

To consolidate the rule of supermen–to perpetuate the British Empire [i.e. the NWO] –one need only remove the ability of slaves to see themselves as slaves.” – Frederick Lindemann (1856-1957) Churchill’s Chief Scientific Adviser

by Madhusree Mukerjee
(abridged by henrymakow.com)

Eugenic ideas feature in a lecture that Lord Cherwell (then known as Professor Lindemann) had delivered more than once, probably in the early 1930s. He had detailed a science-based solution to a challenge that occupied many an intellect of the time: preserving for eternity the hegemony of the superior classes.

Any attempt “to force upon Nature an equality she has never admitted” was bound to lead to bloody strife, the scientist asserted in a draft of this talk.

Instead of subscribing to what he called “the fetish of equality,” he recommended that human differences be accepted and indeed enhanced by means of science. It was no longer necessary, he wrote, to wait for “the haphazard process of natural selection to ensure that the slow and heavy mind gravitates to the lowest form of activity.”

New technologies such as surgery, mind control, and drug and hormone manipulations would one day allow humans to be fine-tuned for specific tasks. Society could create “gladiators or philosophers, athletes or artists, satyrs or monks” at will–indeed, it could manufacture “men with a passion and perhaps even aptitude for any desired vocation.” At the lower end of the race and class spectrum, one could remove from “helots” (the Greek word for slaves) the ability to suffer or to feel ambition.

“Somebody must perform dull, dreary tasks, tend machines, count units in repetition work; is it not incumbent on us, if we have the means, to produce individuals without a distaste for such work, types that are as happy in their monotonous occupation as a cow chewing the cud?” Lindemann asked.

Science could yield a race of humans blessed with “the mental make-up of the worker bee.” This subclass would do all the unpleasant work and not once think of revolution or of voting rights: “Placid content rules in the bee-hive or ant-heap.” The outcome would be a perfectly peaceable and stable society, “led by supermen and served by helots.”

Because many people would evince an “illogical disgust” of such alterations to the nature of the human species, one might have to make do with great apes for such tasks instead of humans, the Prof conceded. It would of course be “somewhat more difficult to make an efficient bricklayer out of a gorilla than out of a bushman,” but at least no one would demand votes on behalf of an ape.

As for the “unlimited number of half-witted children born of mentally defective parents,” sterilization could and should ensure that society be freed of that burden.

“Philosophers have failed to agree on any definition of what is good and what should be our aim is a matter of individual opinion,” the professor summarized.

“But unless we desire to see our civilization perish, to see it disappear as the great eastern cultures of the Nile and Mesopotamia did, unless we wish to prepare [for] new dark ages such as followed the crumbling of the Roman empire, the fundamental cause of present day unrest will have to be removed.”

To consolidate the rule of supermen–to perpetuate the British Empire–one need only remove the ability of slaves to see themselves as slaves.

[Former Scientific American editor Madhusree Mukerjee has just published a historical investigation of Churchill's policies in India, "Churchill's Secret War: The British Empire and Ravaging of India During World War II ".]

Whole article

What the hell are they spraying on us? PART 7

(FoundingFather1776 Notes: The issue of “Chemtrails” is getting more attention, but not nearly enough in my opinion.  This nefarious practice intentionally inflicts untold damage to the health and well-being of every living thing on the planet – indeed the entire ecosystem of the planet itself.  Sick control freaks like the current administration’s “Science Czar” John P. Holdren have openly called for chemtrail spraying in books they have written – see:

http://zombietime.com/john_holdren/#white_house_statement

And he is just one of many such freaks who would do the earth a  great service by simply removing THEMSELVES from the living population!  At any rate; here is an excellent overview of the situation I recently came across on Rense.com.  Please keep informing your friends and neighbors about chemtrails and ask them to LOOK UP IN THE SKY!

Our only hope is to build awareness until the sheep wake-up and start demanding an end to this evil.

Regards,

FoundingFather1776)

Observations On a Damaged Society – Clandestine Weather Modification At All Costs

By Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri

Over the past three years, in order to investigate and observe more closely the vast weather modification across the United States and Canada, I have driven back and forth across the country four times. As part of my research, I also have met with some of the top scientists and researchers. What I knew to be the “United” States (now heavily manipulated behind the scenes by powerful corporations and compliant federal and state governments) today is hardly to be seen.

Some of the US façade remains. But the very deep chasms (no longer mere cracks in our society) are evident everywhere. In fact, one could equate another level of our economic and political chaos with the explosions and underwater chasms in the Gulf of Mexico oil rig catastrophe. It is all part of the bigger, inter-related picture of destruction.

West Coast

From the shapes of the now-ubiquitous synthetic and often EMF clouds, there are several different weather modification programs active. In the Pacific Northwest (perhaps one of the most heavily environmentally poisoned geographic areas), sunshine is rare. This past winter, Oregon and Washington had mostly heavy rains and some snow for months on end. Both are now filled with an abundance of highly toxic heavy metals, including barium (damages the heart), aluminum, and mercury (the last two, long-term, both destroy brain function). People complained frequently in conversations about the lack of sunshine, but the corporate news never reports what is really happening.

The environmental assault is many layered: long-term radiation poisoning from more than 60 years of emissions from the Hanford Nuclear facility (one of the oldest in the country); the burning and release into the air of deadly sarin and VX nerve gases stored at the Army’s Umatilla Chemical Depot [toxic chemicals have been stored there since 1962 but there has been little public discussion](1); large releases of mercury and other hazardous chemicals; and the ever-present toxicity of Chemtrails overhead. Unbelievably, to add to this, Depleted Uranium bombs are also being dropped in the area.(2)

Driving north or south on Interstate 95 and east and west on I-84, there is further environmental damage noticeable. Chemtrails are everywhere overhead. Along both the Columbia River and on I-95 the clear-cutting of the magnificent forests is devastating to see. Where entire mountains have been clear-cut, desertification has set in. The whole ecosystem has been drastically altered. On some stretches of I-95, a thin layer of trees still stands on either side of the highway, as if everything is still in situ. However, I have taken numerous flights along California and Oregon. Seen from overhead at 35,000 feet, the clear-cutting is heart wrenching. Over the past 15-20 years, very little tree replanting has been done. Further, many stands of trees are noticeably unhealthy ­sick and dying.

Most citizens are unaware of the ever-present environmental degradation and dangers, because very little is reported by any mainstream media. Portland, Oregon, is considered a beautiful city and residents consider themselves environmentally “aware” and green. Thousands bike ride and run daily. The tragedy is that most are completely un-informed about the many-layered chemical assaults with each and every breath they inhale.

Chemtrails activity is extensive and heavy and the skies are constantly blanketed with a toxic grayish cover. The smell of chemicals in the air is often quite evident. Yet, when one mentions it, no one seems aware of the odor of chemicals.

Clifford Carnicom, one of our country’s top Chemtrails investigators gave a public lecture in Portland, Oregon, in September 2009, and told the audience that “we are now breathing plasma and assorted poisons” due to Chemtrails and other illegal weather modification programs.(3) After his lecture, he spent another hour and a half answering questions. People want answers. The composition of our air ­essential for our very survival­ has been radically altered. Yet, no public official has replied to repeated concerns of thousands of citizens. In Orwellian doublethink, if public officials don’t respond to concerns or dismiss them, the issues surrounding toxicity don’t exist.

Over the past decade, Clifford Carnicom has focused more on analyzing, under a high-powered microscope, and discovering the probable causes due to the devastation wrought by Chemtrails. He has done ground-breaking research on the newly emerging and painful Morgellons Disease/Syndrome. So far, it is of unknown environmental origin. But it seems likely to have come from some secret bioweapons lab. The invisible nano-technology of fiberglass-coated aluminum, an integral part of these toxic aerosol sprays, has also contaminated the blood of millions of people. In order to discredit those with this painful illness, many medical reports erroneously deflect blame on to innocent citizens. However, there is now ample evidence ­with Carnicom heroically leading the way­ to prove the links, both in humans and other animals, between Chemtrails, its “invisible” polymer fibers, and what comprises Morgellons on a microscopic level. In blood samples Carnicom has discovered: “an encasing filament structure”; and “a chalmydia-like organism (with chalmydia pneumoniathe strongest candidate thus far)an erythrocytic (red blood cell and likely artificial or modified] form; and some possibly Mycoplasma-like form.

Carnicom has also discovered a replication process now found in this newly described “organism” (possibly some kind of synthetic blood); and it is in our mammalian blood (meaning our pets, too).(4) Other aspects of his research show that these unusual biological forms were taken from an airborne sample. It was sent to the EPA; and they refused to examine it. There is no cure for this debilitating affliction, while we continue to be unwitting experimental animals. All of this is illegal both with federal and international laws. Yet it continues.

The long-term effects of more than 12-15 years of illegal aerosol spraying (from military, private, and commercial planes), using all of us as uninformed test subjects, has resulted also in other chronic and multiple illnesses, such as upper respiratory diseases, cardiac illness, and high rates of brain dysfunction.(5) These are now at epidemic proportions and linked to the toxins in Chemtrails. These are often mis-diagnosed or undiagnosed, because most allopathic physicians have no training (or experience) in environmental medicine. It’s the proverbial elephant in the living room: what they don’t know, or can’t see, they cannot diagnose correctly.

I saw this personally earlier this year with my two-and-a-half year old granddaughter. She was diagnosed with a tumor and urged to have surgery. The diagnosis was given by a pediatric specialist; but it was based only on a visual exam. No tests were done to confirm this diagnosis. The second opinion came from the child’s pediatrician (who had recommended the specialist). Neither doctor had any environmental background or training. I urged getting one or two other medical opinions before she was subjected to the trauma of surgery and my deep concern for the effects of anesthesia on a tiny child. Sadly, un-necessary surgery went ahead.

The biopsy report supported my urging of precaution: it was a cyst, not a tumor. The cyst (curable with alternative methods) was not examined for environmental toxins, but everyone is exposed to them. It took her 10 days of wobbling around dizzy, until the last of the serious effects of anesthesia finally wore off. What long-term effects might this have on her immature immune system? None of this trauma was necessary had her parents considered another medical opinion with someone who had training in environmental medicine and ubiquitous toxins. Unsubstantiated medical diagnoses are prevalent; and, unfortunately, parents are placed between their genuine concern (but they are often uninformed about environmental issues) and being pushed by fear into medical treatment that often is un-necessary. The Pacific Northwest is rife with invisible toxins that affect everyone 24/7/365. Every physician should have environmental training, given the endemic poisoning to which we are all exposed. Yet, this is not part of Western medical training. In my public lectures and writings, I repeatedly note: “invisible does not mean safe.”

In discussing environmental toxins with my college students (outside of classroom time), not one student was aware of these dangers. Yet, three of my young students (all under 30) have had major crises this past year: two had hysterectomies and another student was diagnosed with pelvic cancer and underwent chemotherapy. In a discussion with the Dean of Students, he told me there were staggering rates of illness that the college did not have 15 or 20 years ago. Looking back 25 years ago (if you are old enough), can you remember young children and college students having these major illnesses? We didn’t even have childrens’ hospitals then. Cancer is now out of control; and this won’t change until prevention is a major part of the equation.

Allopathic medicine is often not about precaution or real care. It is all about supporting pharmaceutical companies (who make enormous profits on poorly or untested drugs and vaccines) combined with a medical system far too closely tied to the drug industry and supposedly “independent” governmental agencies (where, in fact, a revolving-door policy insures corporate management of the entire medical system). Doctors rarely have any environmental medical training, so the system supports drug solutions, not precaution and prevention. If we had the latter two, we would not have epidemics of cancers (especially children’s and now what used to be rare cancers ­some induced by cell-phone technology). A “cure” for cancer does not mean prevention. The existing situation will only become far worse than it already is with the supposed “health-care reform” ­in essence, “forced” care. This will only exacerbate the already out-of-control environmental crises we already have.

California, the seventh largest economy in the world, already is under siege. The state has been bankrupt for the past two years. State employees are often given IOUs for their paychecks. State-funded universities (UC Berkley had huge student protests early this year) have increased tuition by 30 percent. Many public schools have been shut down, while students are bussed far away from their homes. Schools are in a shambles. US education has become LCD ­the lowest common denominator. Children are dumbed down, and then promoted from grade to grade, whether or not they know the now watered-down material. What then is the worth of a high school diploma? These educational deficits become major stumblings blocks with students who enter college and cannot read or write a coherent sentence ­let alone know how to write a small research paper. Remedial college classes now abound to help these students. When I moved to California 30 years ago, the state had the second best educational system in the US. Today, it ranks 47th. An ignorant and poorly educated population is easy to manipulate. Trivia is all important, while students are engrossed with their cell-phones, chat, and computer time. This isolating technology has become far more important than human interactions. Combine this with news that focuses on the irrelevant manias of starlets and sports idols (often with reprehensible personal habits), and one has the perfect recipe for an updated version of Roman decline.

In addition, over the past eight years, California also has had drastic increases in arsons and extensive wildfires. Hardly anyone has been prosecutedeven when arson-related deaths [i.e., murder] have occurred. Having lived and taught in the state for decades, I speak from personal experience. The 1-million-acre FIRESTORM that hit southern California in October 2003 destroyed thousands of homes and businesses. Up to that time, it was the worst fire in the state’s history. There were 14 arsons that comprised this three-and-a-half-week catastrophe. My neighborhood of 2,000 was completely destroyed by CDF (California Department of Forestry), after our local volunteer firefighters had saved it. It was done for greed: the more the fires raged out of control, the more money CDF firefighters made. It was all covered up by a deceitful “Blue Ribbon Commission.” No one was ever prosecuted.

We had 15 minutes to evacuate our neighborhood. When we were allowed to “return home,” almost four weeks later, nothing was left but burn and ash and hot soil. Despite being declared a “Federal Disaster Area,” we had almost no help from any governmental agency. For those who had any home-owner’s coverage, the insurance companies did everything they could not to pay their policy owners what they were legally entitled to recover. This is the way they consistently do business during a catastrophe. What I call FEMA, the Federal Mis-management Agency, is a military operation that does everything possible to thwart real recovery. This is the way this broken system “works.” This is what we experienced [literally, for years after] and also what happened to those survivors in Hurricanes Rita and Katrina. In fact, when an area is declared a “Federal Disaster,” this means: “tough you are on your own.”

Arsons and long-term drought conditions in California make for a nasty combination. However, with daily Chemtrails assaults overhead, there is also another level of environmental destruction. With his extensive research into the patents for these toxic aerosols, polymer chemist Dr. R. Michael Castle told me personally that one of the highly toxic ingredients is ethyl dibromide. This deliberately causes/increases drought conditions ­especially in an area that already has what used to be natural, semi-arid desert conditions. It is part of what Dr. Castle calls the clandestine planned “Methodic Demise of Natural Earth.”(6)

Ethyl dibromide is a contributing factor in our skin’s dryness and accelerated ageing. It may also be a major factor in excessive Springtime pollen, increases in allergies, dry and itchy eyes, and other skin conditions. It is thought to be a major contributing factor in the pine beetle infestation and sudden oak death in thousands of dead and dying trees in southern California communities and national parks. Pine beetles can infest trees, when sap does not flow, due to (deliberately created) weather-modified drought conditions.

Plains and Mountain States

These states have their own environmental problems. The once-gorgeous expanse of skies across the Plains states (Idaho, Utah, Wyoming, the Dakotas) are now often a washed-out grayish white across what used to be a magnificent, deep blue. Weird-looking, geo-engineered-synthetic clouds abound. “Tentacles” of polymer fibers can be seen in thousands of these clouds. Local TV and radio weather stations never report the visible Chemtrails or the consequences of weather modification ­although everyone talks about the strange weather. The dots are not connected, while the “news” continues to be manipulated by insiders.

Another alarming sight along Interstate 80 (going across Utah and Wyoming) is the current construction of possibly thousands of “road blocks” on what used to be “public” roads. All across the US, thousands of miles of roads have been repaved over the past three years ­and with them many newly posted signs, with large yellow lights, one-half mile before exit ramps, noting: “Warning, when lights flash, exit next.” If you don’t exit when these lights are on, the penalties include fines and jail sentences. [NOTE: photos were impossible to take, due to truck traffic.] Red and white gates (similar to those that lower at railroad-street crossings when a train passes) can now be lowered across the highway for whatever reason. These new gates are often at one exit after another. How many millions of taxpayer dollars went to potentially pen in cars and drivers and cut off traffic flow? There is no sane justification for thisexcept in a police state.

Mid-West States

Not two weeks ago, driving through Indiana, Illinois, Missouri, and Ohio, deeper-blue skies were visible for the first time. Yes, there was still a Chemtrails cloud cover, but often there were “holes” in these clouds where you could see the sky. The sky color there was a far deeper blue than I have seen in more than a decade. In personal conversations with Dr. Castle, he told me he is investigating the reasons for these changes. More news will be forthcoming, as there is new weather modification activity. Again, none of this is reported by mainstream news.

New England and the East Coast

For several years now, New England has been under constant aerosol Chemtrails assault [www.newyorkskywatch.com has been outstanding in regularly reporting the latest news]. This has dramatically altered the weather. Heavy rains and often mountains of snow and blizzards have been the changed winter weather. In the winter of 2007-2008, Maine had a record 16-feet of blizzard snow. In 2008, there was 8-feet of snow. Bitter cold and windy weather with sub-freezing temperatures of 30 and 40 below zero [Fahrenheit], made everything worse.

As in the Pacific Northwest, sometimes there is barely any sunshine. This has affected crops significantly. Without the sunshine, there is less photosynthesis. Consequently, crops with green color now have a “washed-out” color ­not the vibrant dark-green they used to be. This also results in less vitamins and minerals in the vegetables we eat. The organic was movement started decades ago for us to have a safer food supply. This is now totally undermined by Chemtrails spraying. These poisons have entered the entire food chain and the planet’s web of life. Chemtrails, other weather modification assaults, and pesticides all destroy the nutritional value and safety of food that millions of consumers want and think they still have. This is a multi-billion-dollar business. The organic movement could supply a leadership role (backed by millions of consumers) in stopping the Chemtrails and other weather modification assaults.

Economically, the East Coast is in a far worse crisis than is being reported. Last year, New York City’s Mayor Bloomberg closed more than 120 public schools despite vehement parental protest. Again, this is another indication of the disregard of legitimate citizens’ concerns. In Maine, many schools have also been closed this year, due to the broken economy that puts war expenditures ahead of social concerns. Busing students will lead to overcrowding in thousands of schools ­many of which are old and already in serious decay.

The South

The entire southern part of the US and all the states along the Gulf of Mexico are now in extremis ­due to more than five months of on-going lawlessness and complete disregard for all life, resulting from the massive offshore oil rig explosion and subsequent illegal aerosol spraying of Corexit 9500 oil dispersant ­not just over the waters of the Gulf of Mexico but over land as well (done by stealth at night).(7) This is the most toxic dispersant available; and most of its deadly ingredients are “dispersed” underneath the Gulf waters, so as not to be seen. How is the Corexit dispersant combining with Chemtrails? This is not even being addressed. The widespread havoc and mass die-offs of all sea life and the extensive oil catastrophe-induced illnesses are rarely reported as on-going fact on corporate-controlled mainstream TV, radio (even PBS and NPR), and newspapers. There are continued reports of people exposed who are bleeding internally.(8)

The Gulf region has been so poisoned that every two days the toxicity is equivalent to the 1989 ExxonValdez oil catastrophe off Alaska. Numerous reports from Dr. Riki Ott (marine toxicologist and survivor of the ExxonValdez nightmare), and Dr. Chris Pincetich (marine biologist and toxicologist) both continue to report catastrophic animal and bird die-offs, human illnesses, cover-ups of both the extent of the catastrophe and its toxicity, and corruption.(9)

Workers who have been hired by British Petroleum (now called Beyond Petroleum, but better called Beyond Prosecution) have been warned not to talk to reporters. Further, the beaches along the Gulf have been covered at night with sand from other areas (so it looks as though the beaches are untainted). What has happened is that the oil and tar has seeped deeper under the sand to contaminate the area further. No signs have been posted to warn children and adults of the dangers of swimming in toxic waters.

The secret meetings between government officials, agencies, and BP continue to allow for the ecological destruction of an enormous area of the US and the Gulf waters. BP has one of the worst environmental safety records. Nothing is even remotely fixed. This used to be one of our planet’s most vibrant ecosystems. Now the contamination, death, and destruction will be with us for possibly generations. Oil has been found even along the Atlantic Ocean as far up as New Jersey. Any fish or crustaceans caught in the Gulf are not safe to eat. This is another tragic/epic example of how corporations ­with their legalized “personhood”­ have decimated the planet.

We are all in grave danger, as our lives and our planet continue to be trashed by those in charge. As a species, we are failing miserably in being caretakers of our planet. This is our home. As yet, we do not have any Star Trek technology to go to some other planet. Further, global warming is a cover for the illegal geo-engineered destruction of our weather and atmosphere.

I met last week with eminent international scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell. She told me that “weather warfare” has accelerated around the globe. It is no longer just one dangerous h.a.a.r.p. [high active auroral research program] facility in Alaska. The US has another facility in Puerto Rico. Russia has at least one. Another one is at the South Pole. [This has been confirmed also by someone who has been to the South Pole and seen it.] So now, extreme weather (earthquakes in Haiti and China, floods in Pakistan and India) may be caused by the invisible and dangerous tampering of our planet’s atmosphere by more than one h.a.a.r.p. array manipulation. Dr. Bertell is the author of “No Immediate Danger” and “Planet Earth: The Latest Weapon of War. A Critical Study into the Military and the Environment.” These books are essential reading for everyone. Dr. Bertell is an internationally known scientist who, for four decades, has been involved in researching and reporting the dangers of radiation ­even supposedly low levels, which are generally and erroneously reported as not harmful. She is a recipient of the Right Livelihood Award and she led the international Bhopal and Chernobyl Medical Commissions.

The consequences of manipulating our weather ­short and long-term– were never explored, nor has there been any public discussion about these h.a.a.r.p. arrays. We are the guinea pigs for destructive and secret plans by the military and elite, while the Air Force, in its hubris, is on record as wanting “to own” the weather by 2025.(10)

The US system is completely broken ­except for the wealthy and insiders who barely pay any taxes and live in gated communities. This is the new world dis-order devious plan of insiders. Checks and balances are gone. Congress is bought and sold and in thrall by big multi-national corporations. They are a big part of the problems ­not part of the solutions. Our Constitution has been trashed. It is no longer “we, the people.” Rather, now it is “we, the corporations and banks.” As I have written in my book, “The Uterine Crisis,” a corporation’s bottom line is profit. We only count, so they can continue their profits at any and all costs. We are all expendable for corporate profits.

These crises are multi-layered, as Naomi Klein has written in her book, “The Shock Doctrine.” It is the intention of the wealthy and well-connected insiders to bring our country down. It is all being done by stealth and hidden agendas ­while lies and deceit abound.

Yet, the Orwellian façade is crumbling, as more and more citizens are wrecked both physically and financially and see the treachery that is perpetrated on us. More of us are connecting all the dots, and realizing what we think we know is up for re-evaluation. There are outstanding writers, investigative journalists, and professors who have written extensively on the web to give us real news ­to report for the first time what has been hidden from the usual “orchestrated” history of school textbooks. Editors Michel Chossudovsky and Andrew Gavin Marshall’s new book, “The Global Economic Crisis. The Great Depression of the XXI Century” ­just published­ connects the dots of the many layers of our manipulated-behind-the-scenes economic disasters.

Part of the over-all economic crises are directly related to both the private banking consortium of the Federal Reserve ­not accountable to anyone, yet stealing trillions of taxpayer dollars­ and the vast budget (more than three-quarters of the total US budget). The Federal Reserve banks have hijacked our hard-earned, but now worthless inflated fiat dollars. So, when most of our taxpayer dollars go for illegal wars and theft by the Federal Reserve, there is nothing left for vitally needed social services ­education, health and elder care, and other real social services essential to this country’s survival. All our social services are being deliberately destroyed, while the military budget increases astronomical and is thriving.

Thomas Jefferson reminded us: “I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies.” We now have standing armies on our soil –both the National Guard and foreign troops secreted here as well. This is against our Constitutional laws. Roadblocks are in place along well-traversed highways. Our entire web of life is rife with a highly toxic assortment of poisons and hormone-disrupting chemicals that surround our every move. Our children and grandchildren are in grave trouble; and they are our future ­if we are to have a future without a mindless robotic, soma-controlled population.

This is where we find ourselves today. These crises are fixable, although it will take years ­and we are fast running out of time. But real ways out of these nightmares will only happen with a well-informed, well-educated citizenry who choose to find peaceful solutions to the illegal activities that are destroying not just North America, but much of the rest of the planet. PEACEFUL must be the operative word, as these criminals are already spraying us with a wide assortment of hazmat poisons. It is do-able, if we wake up.

*****************

Educator and environmental writer Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri is the author of the critically acclaimed book, “The Uterine Crisis.”

NOTES

1. “Army Starts To Burn VX Rockets In Umatilla.” Oct. 29, 2007: http://news.opb.org/article/637-army-starts-burn-vx-rockets-umatilla. Although not recently updated, http://www.scorecard.com does list, by zip code, which companies are releasing hazmats into the air, water, and soil.

2. Rosalind Peterson. Rosalind Peterson. “US Navy to Conduct Massive Atmospheric Experimental Tests.” Sept. 9, 2009:

http://newswithviews.com/Peterson/rosalind121.htm; and

http://www.newswithviews.com/Peterson/rosalind114.htm; and

http://www.oregonlive.com/environment/index.ssf/2009/02/navy_plan_to_increase_warfare.html

3. For extensive information on his research, see: http://www.carnicom.com and also HYPERLINK “http://www.carnicominstitute.org” http://www.carnicominstitute.org

4. Clifford Carnicom. “Aerosols and Morgellons: A Systems Perspective.” March 23, 2009:

http://www.carnicom.com/aerosols_morgellons_system_perspective.htm; and “Morgellons: A New Classification.” Feb. 3, 2009: www. carnicom.com/morgobs8.htm

5. Dr. Ilya Sandra Perlingieri. “Chemtrails: The Consequences of Toxic Metals and Chemical Aerosols on Human Health.” May 12, 2010. http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=19047

6. R. Michael Castle. “The Methodic Demise of Natural Earth.” June 29, 2009: http://www.newswithviews.com/guest_opinion/guest154.htm

7. Dahr Jamail. “Evidence Mounts of BP Spraying Toxic Dispersants.” Sept. 13, 2010: http://www.truth-out.org/evidence-mounts-bp-spraying-toxic-dispersants63219

8. Deborah Dupré. “Censored Gulf news: Gulf Coaster Trail of Tears. Evacuees flee for health and safety.” Sept. 13, 2010: http://www.examiner.com/human-rights-in-national/censored
-gulf-news-gulf-coasters-trail-of-tears-evacuees-flee-for-health-and-safety

9. “BP Oil Spill Health Emergency Corexit Being Sprayed From Coast Guard Planes!” July 4, 2010:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1FxfYqnlQ50

10. An August 1996 paper presented to USAF, “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather by 2025.” See:

http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf

The Anniversary of 9/11

Dear Readers,

Today is the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks.  I hope you will do me the favor of re-visiting my personal account of that day by reading this post I first published two years ago:

“I Remember 911″

Next, for those of you that doubt the accuracy of my analysis;  who choose to belittle the depth of my research or the reluctance I had to overcome in order to face the horrible truth…..Please read this article.   *ALL* the links you see embedded in this very well-researched piece completely back-up the author’s statements.  I suggest, for the 50% of you out there that still choose to believe the official mythology regarding 9/11 that you spend some time clicking and reading these links.

You can start by viewing this compilation of the free-fall collapse of building 7 and checking out the related info from  http://buildingwhat.org/

According to the Government’s own report, that 47 story,  reinforced building that you just saw from different angles collapse perfectly into it’s own foot-print at free-fall speed……collapsed due to FIRE.

Makes you wonder why they bother using explosives at all?  Why not just set old buildings on fire?

I hope on this Ninth anniversary of the terror-attacks, you remember all the innocent lives lost here and abroad, and the ever-increasing destruction of our bill of rights…..all for a LIE.

I don’t talk about 9/11 much anymore.  Those that know…know.  Those that don’t…well, maybe when “Homeland Security” starts conducting random searches in their homes they will wake-up.  But I doubt it.

God Bless us all….we need it.

Regards,

FoundingFather1776

***********************

Washington’s Blog
September 10, 2010

Don’t want to hear this?

Tough. Grow up.

9/11 Commissioners:

• The 9/11 Commission’s co-chairs said that the 9/11 Commissioners knew that military officials misrepresented the facts to the Commission, and the Commission considered recommending criminal charges for such false statements

• 9/11 Commission co-chair Lee Hamilton says “I don’t believe for a minute we got everything right”, that the Commission was set up to fail, that people should keep asking questions about 9/11, and that the 9/11 debate should continue

• 9/11 Commissioner Timothy Roemer said “We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting”

• 9/11 Commissioner Max Cleland resigned from the Commission, stating: “It is a national scandal”; “This investigation is now compromised”; and “One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9-11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up”

• 9/11 Commissioner Bob Kerrey said that “There are ample reasons to suspect that there may be some alternative to what we outlined in our version . . . We didn’t have access . . . .” He also said that the investigation depended too heavily on the accounts of Al Qaeda detainees who were physically coerced into talking

• And the Senior Counsel to the 9/11 Commission (John Farmer) – who led the 9/11 staff’s inquiry – recently said “At some level of the government, at some point in time…there was an agreement not to tell the truth about what happened”. He also said “I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described …. The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years…. This is not spin. This is not true.” And he said: “It’s almost a culture of concealment, for lack of a better word. There were interviews made at the FAA’s New York center the night of 9/11 and those tapes were destroyed. The CIA tapes of the interrogations were destroyed. The story of 9/11 itself, to put it mildly, was distorted and was completely different from the way things happened”

If even the 9/11 Commissioners don’t buy the official story, why do you?

Senior intelligence officers:

• Former military analyst and famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg said that the case of a certain 9/11 whistleblower is “far more explosive than the Pentagon Papers”. He also said that the government is ordering the media to cover up her allegations about 9/11. And he said that some of the claims concerning government involvement in 9/11 are credible, that “very serious questions have been raised about what they [U.S. government officials] knew beforehand and how much involvement there might have been”, that engineering 9/11 would not be humanly or psychologically beyond the scope of the current administration, and that there’s enough evidence to justify a new, “hard-hitting” investigation into 9/11 with subpoenas and testimony taken under oath (see this and this)

• A 27-year CIA veteran, who chaired National Intelligence Estimates and personally delivered intelligence briefings to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush, their Vice Presidents, Secretaries of State, the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many other senior government officials (Raymond McGovern) said “I think at simplest terms, there’s a cover-up. The 9/11 Report is a joke”

• A 29-year CIA veteran, former National Intelligence Officer (NIO) and former Director of the CIA’s Office of Regional and Political Analysis (William Bill Christison) said “I now think there is persuasive evidence that the events of September did not unfold as the Bush administration and the 9/11 Commission would have us believe (and see this)

• A number of intelligence officials, including a CIA Operations Officer who co-chaired a CIA multi-agency task force coordinating intelligence efforts among many intelligence and law enforcement agencies (Lynne Larkin) sent a joint letter to Congress expressing their concerns about “serious shortcomings,” “omissions,” and “major flaws” in the 9/11 Commission Report and offering their services for a new investigation (they were ignored)

• A decorated 20-year CIA veteran, who Pulitzer-Prize winning investigative reporter Seymour Hersh called “perhaps the best on-the-ground field officer in the Middle East”, and whose astounding career formed the script for the Academy Award winning motion picture Syriana (Robert Baer) said that “the evidence points at” 9/11 having had aspects of being an inside job

• The Division Chief of the CIA’s Office of Soviet Affairs, who served as Senior Analyst from 1966 – 1990. He also served as Professor of International Security at the National War College from 1986 – 2004 (Melvin Goodman) said “The final [9/11 Commission] report is ultimately a coverup”

If even our country’s top intelligence officers don’t buy the official story, why do you?

Congressmen:

• According to the Co-Chair of the Congressional Inquiry into 9/11 and former Head of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Bob Graham, an FBI informant had hosted and rented a room to two hijackers in 2000 and that, when the Inquiry sought to interview the informant, the FBI refused outright, and then hid him in an unknown location, and that a high-level FBI official stated these blocking maneuvers were undertaken under orders from the White House (confirmed here)

• Current Democratic U.S. Senator Patrick Leahy said “The two questions that the congress will not ask . . . is why did 9/11 happen on George Bush’s watch when he had clear warnings that it was going to happen? Why did they allow it to happen?”

• Current Republican Congressman Ron Paul calls for a new 9/11 investigation and states that “we see the [9/11] investigations that have been done so far as more or less cover-up and no real explanation of what went on”

• Current Democratic Congressman Dennis Kucinich hints that we aren’t being told the truth about 9/11

• Current Republican Congressman Jason Chafetz says that we need to be vigilant and continue to investigate 9/11

• Former Democratic Senator Mike Gravel states that he supports a new 9/11 investigation and that we don’t know the truth about 9/11

• Former Republican Senator Lincoln Chaffee endorses a new 9/11 investigation

• Former U.S. Democratic Congressman Dan Hamburg doesn’t believe the official version of events

• Former U.S. Republican Congressman and senior member of the House Armed Services Committee, and who served six years as the Chairman of the Military Research and Development Subcommittee Curt Weldon has shown that the U.S. tracked hijackers before 9/11, is open to hearing information about explosives in the Twin Towers, and is open to the possibility that 9/11 was an inside job

If there is bipartisan questioning of the official story, why aren’t you questioning it?

Other government officials:

• U.S. General, Commanding General of U.S. European Command and Supreme Allied Commander Europe, decorated with the Bronze Star, Silver Star, and Purple Heart (General Wesley Clark) said “We’ve never finished the investigation of 9/11 and whether the administration actually misused the intelligence information it had. The evidence seems pretty clear to me. I’ve seen that for a long time”

• Former Deputy Secretary for Intelligence and Warning under Nixon, Ford, and Carter (Morton Goulder), former Deputy Director to the White House Task Force on Terrorism (Edward L. Peck), and former US Department of State Foreign Service Officer (J. Michael Springmann), as well as a who’s who of liberals and independents) jointly call for a new investigation into 9/11

• Former Federal Prosecutor, Office of Special Investigations, U.S. Department of Justice under Presidents Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan; former U.S. Army Intelligence officer, and currently a widely-sought media commentator on terrorism and intelligence services (John Loftus) says “The information provided by European intelligence services prior to 9/11 was so extensive that it is no longer possible for either the CIA or FBI to assert a defense of incompetence”

• The Group Director on matters of national security in the U.S. Government Accountability Office said that President Bush did not respond to unprecedented warnings of the 9/11 disaster and conducted a massive cover-up instead of accepting responsibility

• Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense under President Ronald Reagan (Col. Ronald D. Ray) said that the official story of 9/11 is “the dog that doesn’t hunt”

• The former director of the FBI (Louis Freeh) says there was a cover up by the 9/11 Commission

If top government officials are skeptical, why aren’t you?

Numerous other politicians, judges, legal scholars, and attorneys also question at least some aspects of the government’s version of 9/11.

The Engineered Economic Collapse

Giordano Bruno
Neithercorp Press
August 17, 2010

“From now on, depressions will be scientifically created.” — Congressman Charles A. Lindbergh Sr. , 1913

Everyone loves money. Even people like myself who abhor the abuse of money and commerce, who understand the fraudulent nature of the system we live in, still work hard and save so that we might attain a sense of stability within that system. Many people see money as a focal point to their existence. But is it really money that they are after, or is it something else entirely? In truth, money represents ‘security’ in the minds of the masses. Money affords us the ability to survive, and the more of it we have, the safer we all feel. Because we subconsciously associate the extension of our very life with the variable health of the economic structure in which we live, we tend to become unwitting devotees to its continued existence, even if it is corrupt and condemned to failure. We gullibly deny the system or the currency that supports it is doomed to the contrary of all evidence because, even though it has beaten us bloody, we have never known anything else.

In light of this entrenched way of perceiving things, especially in the U.S., it is difficult enough to convince some people that the economy is in fact not providing the security they desire, but is actually destroying their future completely. To explain to them that this is deliberate, that the economy is designed to self-destruct, that is another prospect altogether.

Many people hit a proverbial wall on this issue because they simply cannot fathom that certain groups of men (globalists and central bankers) view money and economy in completely different terms than they do. The average American lives within a tiny box when it comes to the mechanics and motivations of finance. They think that their monetary desires and drives are exactly the same as a globalist’s. But, what they don’t realize is that the box they think in was BUILT by globalists. This is why the actions of big banks and the decisions of our mostly corporate establishment run government seem so insane in the face of common sense. We try to rationalize their behavior as “idiocy”, but the reality is that their goals are highly deliberate and so far outside what we have been taught to expect that some of us lack a point of reference. If you cannot see the endgame, you will not understand the steps taken to reach it until it is too late.

In the past we have covered numerous instances in which global bankers have admitted to fraud on a massive scale, fraud which is now crushing our already fragile economy. We have covered the private Federal Reserve and how it knowingly facilitated the creation of the housing bubble, as well as how it is now inflating a Treasury bubble which is soon to implode. We have covered Goldman Sachs and its efforts to promote and sell toxic derivatives all over the world while at the same time betting against those derivatives on the open market. We have covered the manipulation of gold and silver markets by companies like JP Morgan, which have recently been exposed by whistleblowers and GATA investigations. And, most importantly, we have executed in-depth analysis on the growing weakness of the U.S. dollar in preparation for severe currency devaluation. These revelations raise questions, which is natural, but they also illicit misconceptions and reckless knee-jerk reactions, especially when broaching the fact that the illegal strategies of international banks are part of a greater agenda.

Below, we will examine some of the most common narrow minded responses to the issue of engineered economic collapse, as well as why people think the way they do when the “semi-sacred” subject of money is involved…

1. The economy is too complex to be controlled by just a handful of people…

This response often comes from people who make presumptions on economics, rather than actually educating themselves on how the system works. From the outside looking in, the world of finance appears chaotic; a mixture of mathematical and legal standards swirling in a void of mass psychology. Many Americans are either frightened off by the seemingly complicated field of study, or they find it rather boring and not worth their time. This, however, does not stop them from assuming that they know how money works.

The problem is that just because a person participates in his economy daily, it does not mean he has any understanding of how it operates. Many watch television on a daily basis, but few have any idea how the picture actually gets onto the screen, or how to fix a television once it is broken. Sadly, our egocentric culture has led a substantial portion of the public to imagine that they are experts on EVERYTHING, and thus, true researchers in the fields of economics and globalism get reactions like the one above constantly.

At bottom, once all the quasi-technical biz-babble used by mainstream talking heads is removed from the equation, economics is rather simple. Supply and Demand will always be at the center of any and every economy, regardless of the political atmosphere it exists in. These two fundamental factors can be manipulated to a point, by the creation of artificial supply, or the conjuring of false demand. This is achieved in many ways by global bankers, but primarily through domination of the issuance of currency, the ability to change interest rates at will, as well as the ability to inject or remove incredible sums of money from any market.

A perfect example is the suppression of silver prices by JP Morgan:

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/whistleblower-exposes-jp-morgans-silver-manipulation-scheme

Gold and silver represent competing currencies to the fiat dollars created by the Federal Reserve, and suppressing the value of these commodities helps to ensure that the public will never see them as a viable alternative to paper assets. JP Morgan, who along with other international banks has the ability to throw around massive quantities of capital wherever they please, suppresses the value of physical silver by issuing paper securities for silver that doesn’t actually exist (creating an artificially high supply), and naked short selling silver markets to drive them lower (creating the false impression of low demand).

Another good example of economic manipulation is the private Federal Reserve’s strategy during the 90’s under Alan Greenspan to artificially lower interest rates, allowing banks to issue credit at historical levels for over a decade. Linked below is an article from Ron Paul’s ‘Texas Straight Talk’ dated March, 2007, before the housing market even began its full swan-dive. In it, he discusses the Federal Reserve’s direct role in the creation of the housing bubble:

http://www.house.gov/paul/tst/tst2007/tst031907.htm

Men like Ron Paul, Peter Schiff, Gerald Celente, Jim Rogers, and many others were able to predict long before hand that the Federal Reserve’s actions were creating an explosive mortgage and credit bubble, yet, we are supposed to believe that the Federal Reserve had “no idea” that their actions would result in a debt implosion?

Catherine Austen Fitts, former Assistant Secretary of Housing and Commissioner of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development under the first Bush Administration stated conversely that the mortgage bubble was absolutely not an accident, and that she had witnessed outright and deliberate fraud on the part of the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve Bank in creating the bubble. The fact that disturbed her most, however, was her discovery that only a small handful of international banks were responsible for the perpetuation of toxic mortgage debt, not just in America, but around the world:

http://solari.com/blog/?p=2058

Goldman Sachs (one of the primary globalist banks involved in the igniting of the debt crisis) was caught red-handed selling toxic derivatives to investors and governments all over the planet while at the same time betting against those derivatives on the market. Goldman even bet against mortgage securities the bank itself created!

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-26/goldman-sachs-bet-against-its-own-deals-senate-s-levin-says.html

This is sort of similar to a car maker selling vehicles without brake lines, then placing bets that their clients will crash and burn. Essentially, it is blatant and sociopathic fraud! Goldman’s actions directly contributed to credit collapses in numerous countries, including Greece, and here in the U.S.

The idea that global banks can turn the economy on and off like a light switch may be a stretch, but the vast majority of evidence shows that they do have the ability to shift the direction of markets to a point, as well as the ability to spur the growth of bubbles that eventually lead to recessions, depressions, and beyond. In fact, if one examines the U.S. economy from the inception of the Federal Reserve in 1913, they would find that the past century has been nothing but a series of engineered equity bubbles designed to slowly hobble, but not completely cripple, our financial system and our currency, at least, until recently. Like a steam locomotive on a collision course with a bottomless canyon, globalist banks can slow or speed up the pace of our descent, but the final destination never changes.

Now that we have established that market collapses can be created by a small handful of bankers and done knowingly, lets move on to the next most common sheeple-like talking point.

2. Yes, international banks triggered the meltdown, but the “greed of Capitalism” is truly to blame (i.e. Its all the Republican Party’s fault)…

First off, if you’re parroting the fiscal debate points of two dimensional socialist gatekeepers like Michael Moore, then you’re already hopelessly lost in the mind warping hedge maze of the false left/right paradigm. You should stay as far away as possible from adult conversions on economics, especially if you plan on associating the “greed” of capitalism and corporatism with the Republican Party alone.

News Flash! Barack Obama received far more in corporate campaign donations (including donations from BP and Exxon) than McCain did. Both Bush Jr. and Obama increased government spending to record levels meaning Neo-Conservatives are in no way “conservative” (as a true Republican is supposed to be). Obama has consistently surrounded himself with banksters and corporate lobbyists, including various hobgoblins from the bowels of Goldman Sachs. BOTH major parties are owned and operated by global banks. This is a cold hard undeniable truth of our political system. There is no way around it. Learn it, accept it as reality, and stop trying to blame one side or the other for problems that both sides created! If you cannot do this, your view of our cultural state of affairs will always be horribly skewed and your insights on our social problems will be utterly worthless.

While wannabe socialists desperately clamor to point fingers at the free market ideology as the cause of all our ills, the fact is that none of us have ever lived in a truly free market system. Since the inception of the Federal Reserve in 1913, all markets and even our own currency have become more and more vulnerable to manipulation by the banking elite. We have lived our entire lives in a rigged market, not a free market. To blame the very concept of Capitalism for our current dire circumstances is not only naïve, it is dangerous. Globalists would like nothing better than to promote the illusion that “too much freedom” led us to this disaster, and that severe controls must be put into place to ensure that it “never happens again”.

3. Global banks would never engineer the collapse of the U.S. economy or the Dollar. It makes them too much money…

This often heard song and dance ties in with the number two comment above. Again, the assumption is that the globalists only do what they do out of an “uncontrollable greed for money”. This perpetuates a couple fallacies. First, it encourages the false belief that the end concern for the Elite is the accumulation of riches. Central bankers have the ability to PRINT all the money they want from thin air! Remember, the Federal Reserve has never been subjected to a full audit, meaning they could easily create billions if not trillions without any oversight whatsoever. Greed for money, to them, is surely an absurd notion. What they do want, more than anything else, is social power. They want control over every living human being without question. All other concerns are secondary.

The next fallacy underlying the above argument is the conjecture that the U.S. economy is somehow indispensable to global banks. This is simply not so. Where we see the economy as an extension of our culture and ourselves, the Elites see financial systems as mere tools in the pursuit of a greater goal: World Government. Imagine you are building a house. Once your saw has fulfilled its intended role of cutting the wood, do you cling to it, or do you throw it aside and pick up a hammer? This is how globalists look at financial systems. They are perfectly willing to cast off the U.S. economy like a snake shedding skin if it brings them closer to attaining their ultimate aim.

The same goes for the Dollar. The Greenback may be the premier world reserve currency now, but that can and likely will change very quickly over the next couple years. The Dollar is a device that has outlived its usefulness as far as global bankers are concerned. The IMF has on several occasions made it clear that they eventually intend for the SDR (Special Drawing Rights) to replace the Dollar as the world reserve currency, and they have openly admitted that it will one day be established as a global currency. IMF press releases make this development sound far off and away, but SDR accumulations by countries around the world have risen dramatically in the past year. This along with other factors we will cover (namely China’s preparations to dump their U.S. T-bond holdings) show that IMF actions indicate they are preparing for a collapse of the Dollar now!

4. China would never dump U.S. Treasuries because it would hurt them as much as it hurts us…

The theory that China is somehow fused to the U.S. in a kind of symbiotic seesaw relationship that can never be broken is so ingrained among mainstream American financial analysts it simply will not die, regardless of how much contradictory evidence you show them. It really is like a mental disease which causes MSM pundits to go into involuntary Tourettic convulsions every time you mention the words “Treasury bond dump”. America and China are not conjoined twins, and one can survive without the other. We have covered the China issue over and over again, and I will not rehash all that evidence here. To lay it out simply: China has re-engineered its economy towards consumption and importation rather than relying on exports. The IMF has talked about this on many occasions with apparent excitement:

http://www.imf.org/external/np/tr/2010/tr072910c.htm

China has also finalized the ASEAN trading bloc which has combined export markets at least equal to that of the U.S. Meaning, China already has another place to send its exports besides America.

Most importantly, China must increase their currency’s value if their new consumer based system is to survive. Allowing the Yuan to rise sharply in value will revitalize the buying power of the Chinese populace making greater consumption possible. Indeed, China MUST dump their Treasury holdings and pump up the Yuan if they are to hold their economy together. And, the Federal Reserve has given China every reason to turn its back on Treasuries through never ending liquidity injections. This is not to say that a U.S. collapse will not affect them, it would negatively affect the entire world. However, China has positioned itself to survive, and perhaps even thrive with their economic expansions into Africa, and their new financial agreements with Germany.

Finally, the Chinese have been very forthcoming over the past week about plans to drop Treasuries. China has dumped over 7.7% of their U.S. T-Bond holdings since January, including the biggest T-bond dump on record this month. They have openly admitted to a plan to diversify away from the Dollar:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2010-08-17/china-cuts-long-term-treasury-holdings-by-most-ever-as-u-s-yields-decline.html

I’m always fascinated by those economists who vehemently deny China will ever turn away from the U.S. Dollar while they are doing so right in plain view. Are MSM analysts simply crazy? I don’t know, but it would explain a lot…

5. Sure, bankers took advantage, but it’s really the American people’s fault for getting suckered…

Yes, a sizable portion of the American public can be gut wrenchingly stupid. It hurts my head and my feelings to see people act so idiotic, it really does. The problem with this argument though is that when it is taken too far it becomes an attempt to divert blame away from the criminals and place it on the victims. If you knowingly leave your front door unlocked in a bad neighborhood and you find your home ransacked the next day, then you are partly responsible. But, we cannot forget that the neighborhood is “bad” in the first place because of the criminals, not the people who don’t lock their doors.

Just because global banks can sucker the public doesn’t mean they should, or that they cannot be judged for it. The crime ultimately rests on those men who made the conscious effort to destroy this country, and the blame rests with them as well. I see the attempt to parlay the economic collapse into the lap of the American people very often lately, especially from bankers who now claim that it’s the American public’s fault entirely. Why? Because they will not spend more, they will not take on more debt, they will not take on more risk, and they will not believe hard enough in the recovery that never was. Imagine a serial rapist behind a podium admonishing women for carrying pepper spray. It’s eerily similar…

6. Ok, maybe the banks are causing a collapse, but to say the government is helping them is just crazy conspiracy theory…

Why is it that the Federal Reserve has never been fully audited? Why is it that when Ron Paul tried to pass HR 1207 Federal Reserve Transparency Bill, it was muddled in committees and then eventually derailed? Why is it that banks like Goldman Sachs have been caught, yes caught, setting the stage for an economic implosion in this country, yet no government indictments have been formed to criminally prosecute them? Why are these men still roaming free like locusts to continue pillaging at will? Are we supposed to feel lucky that we get table scraps like Bernie Madoff behind bars while the Federal Reserve commits Ponzi fraud on a scale that dwarfs his?

Our government, both major parties, is owned lock stock and barrel. This is why there are no satisfactory answers for the questions posed above. Elements of the U.S. Government including almost every president since 1912 have not only turned a blind eye to Globalist activities, they have offered their full support to the bankers.

Nixon removed the Dollar from the gold standard in 1971 giving the Fed free reign to print as much fiat as they wished without limitations. In 1980 the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act was passed placing all banks essentially under the rules of the Federal Reserve. The Glass-Steagall Act which kept investment banks and depository banks separate was repealed under a Republican majority in the Senate, and then finalized by Democratic President Bill Clinton in 1999. 30 years ago, banks that held your home mortgage were for the most part required to keep that mortgage until it was finally paid. But, a series of government decisions spanning that period and influenced by global banks allowed for the “securitization” of mortgages, leading to the creation of “derivatives”, which were then used by corporate mobsters like Goldman Sachs to destroy our financial system. Last, but certainly not least, both the Bush and Obama Administrations pressured Congress into passing highly unpopular bailout legislation which basically rewarded the same banks that created the credit crisis with trillions in taxpayer dollars (yes, the bailouts are now actually in the trillions, not billions). This led to the coining of the term “too big to fail” (or “too big to jail”). Our Government has been nothing but complicit in the banker takeover of this country. To debate otherwise is to invite embarrassment.

I haven’t even scratched the surface of government involvement in the collapse of our economy. Cases like the Savings and Loan crisis of the 1980’s led to serious prosecutions and jail time for more than 1100 criminal bankers, but this only caused the government to respond by changing investigation rules to make it even more difficult to catch the high level fraudsters in the act! Linked below is an interview between Max Keiser and bank regulator Prof. William K Black who outlines our government’s complicity in the breakdown of the country it is mandated to protect.

Elites destroy cultures to make way for new philosophies; their philosophies. Its not so much “conspiracy theory” as it is a widely admitted methodology. Corporate globalists believe in global government on their terms and they barely try to hide it. If someone thinks this sounds “fantastical” then they haven’t been paying the slightest attention. When one understands how Elites view economy, and realizes their primary motivations, the fact that they purposely triggered a collapse is perfectly logical. Nothing besides all out war inspires more fear and desperation in a society than a financial upheaval. Such elements on a mass scale allow changes in our collective psychology that were never possible before. Most people tend to falter under such an overwhelming threat and turn towards any authority (or fake authority) to save them from harm. Some people scoff at this idea, but it is likely they have never actually been in the wake of a real national catastrophe before. Men, especially those who know little of themselves, can change quickly in the face of calamity. The Elites recognize this, engineer tragedy, then waltz into the aftermath to merrily lord over the rubble.

Will their plan work? I think not, but I’m an optimist (no, really). The pursuit of total control and total power seems rather infantile to me, be it on an impressively psychotic level. Although, if we are made to forget who the real enemy is, then I think they do have a chance at success. That is how they have remained successful to this point. Only now does the average man have such immense knowledge at his fingertips, the knowledge to bring down a line despots and tyrants that have reigned for centuries. If only the average man was not so easily deterred by WMD’s (Weapons of Mass Distraction). The Elites will likely ignite some wars, tempt us into in-fighting, and fabricate enemies like Al Qaeda out of the ether. As the slogan goes, “Order Out Of Chaos”. Whatever happens, our eyes must remain fixed on the root of the problem; the bankers, and nothing else.

Globalists are not invincible, they are not untouchable, they are not even all that brilliant. They are human, and they have made many mistakes. The engineering of an economic meltdown really changes nothing. Hired thugs, useful idiots, corrupt officials, even hyperinflation, all tiny obstacles when considering the world we could have if the Elites were finally made to face the reckoning they deserve. Americans once took on the greatest empire on Earth. We once took a feared king to task. Are a bunch of frothing corporate bankers really so daunting? All that is needed is a principled movement with the will to see justice done, and I believe we have that already.