An earlier version of this report was published at Global Research. Below is the revised version.
A review of “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies”
By Rady Ananda
At an international symposium held in Ghent, Belgium May 28-30, 2010, scientists asserted that “manipulation of climate through modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy theory.” It is “fully operational” with a solid sixty-year history. Though “hostile” environmental modification was banned by UN Convention in 1978, its “friendly” use today is being hailed as the new savior to climate change and to water and food shortages. Military forces stand poised to capitalize on controlling the world’s weather.
“In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.”
~World Meteorological Organization, 2007
The only conspiracy surrounding geoengineering is that most governments and industry refuse to publicly admit what anyone with eyes can see. Peer-reviewed research is available to anyone willing and able to maneuver the labyrinth of scientific journals. So, while there is some disclosure on the topic, full public explanation is lacking. A brief list of confirmed cloud seeding events is produced at bottom, starting in 1915.
Going under a variety of names – atmospheric geoengineering, weather modification, solar radiation management, chemical buffering, cloud seeding, weather force multiplication – toxic aerial spraying is popularly known as chemtrails. However, this is merely one technique employed to modify weather. The practice of environmental modification is vast and well funded.
Hosted by the Belfort Group, which has been working for the last seven years to raise public awareness of toxic aerial spraying, the Symposium included chemtrail awareness groups from Greece, Germany, Holland, France and the U.S. Belfort published five videos covering only May 29,[1] when filmmaker Michael Murphy (Environmental Deception and What in the world are they spraying)[2] and aerospace engineer Dr. Coen Vermeeren [3] gave the most dramatic presentations.
Dr Vermeeren, of the Delft University of Technology, presented [4] a 300-page scientific report entitled, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” [5]
Case Orange notes it was prepared for the Belfort Group by a team of scientists but presented anonymously. It was sent to embassies, news organizations and interested groups around the world “to force public debate.”
The report spends some time on HAARP, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, [6] which is a military endeavor focused on manipulation of the ionosphere, magnetosphere and atmosphere, and on other exotic weapon systems that manipulate the environment. While related, they go beyond this discussion of chemtrails.
In the interest of brevity, the health and environmental implications of cloud seeding is not discussed in any depth herein. Case Orange does go into it, as did most of the speakers at the Belfort Symposium. Cursory research reveals a debate among researchers as to chemtrail toxicity, but whether that’s a 50-50 or 99-1 argument is unknown.
Contrails Are Chemtrails
Case Orange rejects use of the term ‘chemtrails’ because it is associated with amateur conspiracy theorists. The only credible document it could find that uses it is the Space Preservation Act of 2001 introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). [7] H.R. 2977 sought to ban the use of exotic weapon systems that would damage climate, weather, tectonic and biological systems. “Chemtrails” are specifically listed. Though later removed, no version of the bill ever became law.
Instead, the writers prefer the term ‘persistent contrails’ to describe the phenomenon since all contrails are chemtrails. ‘Persistent contrails’ distinguishes those that contain weather-altering additives from those that represent normal aircraft exhaust that dissipates after a few seconds or minutes.
Case Orange also rejects misanthropic intentions behind persistent contrails on the assumptions that 1) public health agencies have the public interest at heart; and 2) the economy is consumer driven. The authors indicate no awareness of numerous reports of collusion between the pharmaceutical industry and government health agencies. This year, a significant conflict-of-interest report appeared in the prestigious British Medical Journal, which further heightened suspicions that the H1N1 flu and its vaccines were a scam.[8] Nor do the authors consider that sick people will spur economic growth in a capitalist (for profit) health system.
Dr. Vermeeren gave his own introductory remarks and conclusions, but spent the bulk of the hour presenting information from Case Orange. He frankly admitted the existence of persistent contrails.
“We also know that chemtrails do exist because we do spraying; for crops, for example, and we know that they have been spraying for military purposes. So, chemtrails is nothing new. We know about it.”
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LISTEN TO Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech, Afternoon Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins.) http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427
DOWNLOAD the “CASE ORANGE” Report (PDF without appendices)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
“Weather manipulation through contrail formation … is in place and fully operational.”
Case Orange cites publicly available material that shows geoengineering has been ongoing for “at least 60 years.” Used as a weapon of war in Hamburg by the UK during World War II, it was also used in the Vietnam Conflict by the US. Controversy over its use, revealed by investigative reporter Jack Anderson, spurred Senate hearings in 1972. During those hearings, military officials denied the use of cloud seeding technology. Later, a private letter from Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird surfaced, admitting that his testimony was false. He, again unbelievably, claimed he didn’t know what was happening. [9]
Environmental modification (EnMod) weaponry was finally banned by treaty in 1978. The UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques forced the end of such programs, overtly anyway.[10] (Case Orange authors seem unaware of this international ban, as it is one of their recommendations.)
However, with widespread reporting of rising global temperatures, increasing population, and degradation of water supplies, renewed interest in EnMod is now becoming broadly supported. (See, e.g., Top economists recommend climate engineering, 4 Sep 2009 [11] and similarly, Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’, 1 Sep 2009.[12])
Building a case for old technology finding a new market, Case Orange discusses several U.S. patents. For example, authors describe a 1975 patent, “Powder Contrail Generation,” [13] for the invention of a:
“specific contrail generation apparatus for producing a powder contrail having maximum radiation scattering ability for a given weight [of] material. The seeding material … consists of 85% metallic particles and 15% colloidal Silica and Silica gel in order to produce a stable contrail that has a residence period of 1 up to 2 weeks.”
In 2009, researchers published “Modification of Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” which proposed two methods of delivery for this same proportion of metallics to silica and the same staying power of one to two weeks.[14]
Case Orange also reveals a 1991 patent held by Hughes Aircraft Company [15] that:
“contains 18 claims to reduce global warming through stratospheric seeding with aluminum oxide… thorium oxide … and refractory Welsbach material ….”
The report notes that “the proposed scenario by the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] in 2001 is identical to the claims” in Hughes Aircraft’s 1991 patent. Hughes was acquired by Raytheon, a private defense contractor, in 1997, “the same company that acquired E-systems and the HAARP contract.”
Case Orange presents evidence that Raytheon stands to control all weather, which the authors find repugnant given that it is a private corporation. The authors recommend suing private corporations instead of governments. But subcontracting is quite common for governments and agencies, especially the US military. The distinction between large, powerful corporations and governments is a fine line obscure to common folk. And, the effect is the same whether governments are spraying us with nano-sized metals, chemicals or biologicals, or whether corporations do. The authors’ protective posture toward governments is nonsensical.
Case Orange suggests that geoengineering found new life in the global warming scare. Old patents are being dusted off and private interests stand to make substantial sums now that Cap and Trade has been exposed as ineffective in reducing greenhouse gases. (Although, lawmakers are still considering it since much can be earned on the scheme, to wit: Al Gore reportedly achieved billionaire status from it.)
Since 2007, billionaire Bill Gates has spent at least $4.5 million on geoengineering research. [16] Since reducing emissions is not popular with industry, ‘Plan B’ – geoengineering – is being touted as the answer to climate change and water shortage. A longer description of Plan B is: Add more pollution to the sky and water to offset the deleterious effects of industrial pollution, without reducing industrial pollution.
Human rights and environmental watchdog, ETC Group, describes the momentum [17]:
“The roll-out of geoengineering as Plan B is being skillfully executed: prominent high-level panels sponsored by prestigious groups, a spate of peer-reviewed articles this January in science journals, and a line-up of panicked politicians in northern countries, nodding nervously in agreement as scientists testify about the ‘need to research Plan B.’”
ETC reports that Gates’ top geoengineering advisor unveiled a plan to grow solar radiation management research “one-hundred-fold, from $10 million to $1 billion over ten years.”
Indeed, several watchdog groups recently ramped up calls to address clean water shortage. “At the end of July 2010, the United Nations General Assembly will vote on an important resolution, initiated by the Bolivian government, which would make clean water and sanitation a human right,” reports Food and Water Watch.[18] This year, National Geographic and Yes! Magazine dedicated entire issues to water.
~~~
Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025
Case Orange ties a 1996 report by top military personnel in the U.S., “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” [19] to evidentiary details (like governmental spraying schedules, chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operating manuals, and calls for geoengineering by economists) to support its notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate control projects.”
Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific timeline for the use of EnMod technologies in cooperation with the Weather Modification Association (WMA), a business-government group promoting the beneficial uses of environmental modification [20]: (Here is a link to a downloadable full version pdf of the declassified report:) http://csat.au.af.mil/2025/volume3/vol3ch15.pdf
2000 Introduce ionic mirrors, with a sharp increase from 2008;
2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as well as military) aviation;
2004 Create smart clouds thru nanotechnology, with exponential increase after 2010;
2005 Introduce ‘carbon black dust’.
Though Case Orange decries the paucity of research into EnMod, in 2009 Weather Modification Assn. published its position statement on the safety of seeding clouds with silver-iodide, citing three dozen research papers from 1970 through 2006. [21]
In 2007, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) published its position statement that included “Guidelines for the Planning of Weather Modification Activities.” Acknowledging that the modern technology of weather modification began in the 1940s, WMO asserts it is still “an emerging technology” today. [22] WMO indicated disappointment that research is being abandoned for operations.
Case Orange contains no reference to the WMA position statement citing all that research, although it cites the group. Nor does it mention the World Meteorological Organization, an agency of the United Nations, which has a link to its Weather Modification portal on its Index page.
At the end of the section, The bare necessity of geoengineering through cloud generation for survival of the planet (5.2.7), Case Orange states:
“[O]ur investigation team comes to the conclusion that climate control programs, controlled by the military but approved by governments, are silently implemented in order to avoid the worst case scenarios they obviously do not want. The two basic instruments are temperature control through generation of artificial clouds and manipulation of the ionosphere through ionosphere heaters.
“Both remain basically military combat systems with the option to go into the offensive if deemed necessary. However since several ionosphere heaters are installed on various places around the globe one can assume that there is wide cooperation between governments in order to reach the climate targets by 2025: controlling the weather and thus the planet.”
The report published the following images provided by a former meteorologist at the Ontario Weather Service, showing spraying schemes for Europe. For December 6, 2008:
In the next series of images covering January 3-5, 2010, the authors assert that “The spraying schemes seem to be organized in a logical pattern so that the whole of Europe is covered in a 3-day period”:
Case Orange agrees that climate change needs to be addressed. Regarding Climate-Gate, the authors suggest that the University of East Anglia deliberately manipulated the climate data to gradually prepare the global population for its future on a hotter planet.
They also cite research that supports the notion that climate change is real. During the three-day grounding of most aircraft after 9/11, scientists noticed an increase in temperature of 1.1 °C (2 °F). [23] This is an astounding increase in such a short time frame. The incidence of cloud seeding reports by the public increases exponentially after this.
The 1996 military piece, Owning the Weather in 2025, gives climate change skeptics “an insight in what to expect in the 21st century:
‘Current demographic, economic and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn weather modfication ability into capability. In the United States weather modification will likely become part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.’”
~~~
Recommendations
“Persistent contrails,” however, “have a devastating impact on eco-systems on this planet and quality of life in general.” Case Orange joins the call of Bill Gates’ geoengineering advisor and the WMO for new research measuring the impact on human health and the environment from EnMod programs.
Case Orange also recommends an immediate and full disclosure of current EnMod activities to the public; and that all civil aviation laws be abided.
Of note, in response to policy interest in geoengineering as a means to control climate change and enhance water supplies, on May 14, 2010, the science subcommittee of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity proposed a geoengineering moratorium. [24] This proposed ban on “friendly” EnMod programs will be heard at the Tenth Conference of Parties to UN Convention on Biodiversity in Nagoya, Japan this October.
Case Orange reports that China and Russia openly admit to cloud-seeding, while the U.S. denies such activities. The U.S. does permit open air testing of chemical and biological weapons but not under the law the authors cited, which they paraphrased:
The secretary of defense may conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological agents on civilian populations.
Public law of the United States, Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977.
Codified as 50 USC 1520, under Chapter 32 Chemical and Biological Warfare Program, Public Law 95-79 was repealed in 1997 by Public Law 105-85. In its place, 15 USC 1520a provides restrictions (such as informed consent). 50 USC 1512, however, allows open air testing of chemicals and biologicals and allows presidential override of notices and of public health considerations for national security reasons. [25] Case Orange authors are thus correct, it seems, in asserting that such programs are legal, if reprehensible, in the U.S.
Conclusion
For centuries, military leaders have recognized that it rains after a heavy battle. But harnessing that power in a way that doesn’t cause a deluge like in San Diego in 1915 has been a task. (See Brief History, below.) The historical record has many such stories: misdirected hurricanes, farm wars, massive flooding and mudslides. Eventually, though, science met the challenge.
If its birth can be marked by Britain’s successful use of chaff in 1943 to jam enemy radar, the modern environmental modification program is 67 years old. We saw its military use in Vietnam in the 1960s. China openly used it in 2008 to clear the skies for the Olympics.
In 1978, world leaders addressed the moral and ecological issues of using such technologies as a weapon of war by banning their use. Almost thirty years later, in 2007, the World Meteorological Organization complained that EnMod funds were moving from research into operations. Three years later, in May of this year, the United Nations proposed the ban of EnMod operations, calling for further research.
Even with a couple obvious holes in research, the Case Orange report is essentially correct: officials are spraying the skies, and they’re not fully disclosing these activities. Corporate media is colluding with officials in keeping these operations secret from the public.
But, the public has a right to know and governments have a duty to fully disclose all environmental modification operations. The impacts on our health and environment need to be fully understood, and informed consent from the populace needs to be a part of any EnMod operation.
~~~
A Brief History of Cloud Seeding
Cloud seeding, as a US military research project, began as early as the 1830s, according to Colby College professor, James R. Fleming. [26] Verifiably successful rainmaking attempts did not occur until 1915.
1915 To end a prolonged drought, San Diego hired reputed rainmaker Charles Hatfield, who claimed that the evaporation of his secret chemical brew atop wooden towers could attract clouds. San Diego was rewarded with a 17-day deluge that totaled 28 inches. The deadly downpour washed out more than 100 bridges, made roads impassable over a huge area, destroyed communications lines, and left thousands homeless. [27]
1943 “The first operational use of chaff (aluminium strips which are precisely cut to a quarter of the radar’s wavelength) took place in July 1943, when [the British Royal Air Force subjected Hamburg] to a devastating bombing raid. The radar screens were cluttered with reflections from the chaff and the air defence was, in effect, completely blinded.” [28]
1946 General Electric’s Vincent Schaefer dropped six pounds of dry ice into a cold cloud over Greylock Peak in the Berkshires, causing an “explosive” growth of three miles in the cloud. [29]
1947 Australian meteorologists successfully repeated the process. [30]
1949 Project Cirrus: From a desert near Albuquerque, Nobel Laureate Irving Langmuir and General Electric researcher Vincent Schaefer fed ten ounces of silver iodide into a blowtorch apparatus and brought down 320 billion gallons of rain across half of New Mexico. [31]
1950 Harvard meteorologist Wallace Howell seeded New York City skies with dry ice and silver iodide smoke, filling the city’s reservoirs to near capacity. [32]
1952 The UK’s Operation Cumulus resulted in 250 times the normal amount of rainfall, killing dozens and destroying landscapes. [33]
1962-1983 Operation Stormfury, a hurricane modification program, had some success in reducing winds by up to 30%. [34]
1966-1972 Project Intermediary Compatriot (later called Pop Eye) successfully seeded clouds in Laos. The technique became part of military actions in Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos from 1967 to 1972. Initially revealed by Jack Anderson in the Washington Post, 18 Mar 1971. [35]
1986 The Soviet air force diverted Chernobyl fallout from reaching Moscow by seeding clouds. Belarus, instead, was hit with the toxic fallout. [36]
2008 Chinese government used 1,104 cloud seeding missiles to remove the threat of rain ahead of the Olympic opening ceremony in Beijing. [37]
2009 Moscow Halo. Case Orange cites this as evidence of cloud seeding, but others suspect it is electromagnetic in origin. Russian authorities said it was an optical illusion. [38]
This is by no means a comprehensive list; indeed, volumes are dedicated to the subject.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Notes:
[1] Belfort Group videos of International Symposium on Chemtrails, May 29, 2010 proceedings. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/belfort-test
[2] Michael Murphy website: http://truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com/
[3] Dr Coen Vermeeren, Delft University of Technology bio, n.d. (Translated from Dutch to English by Google): http://snipurl.com/10oirj
[4] Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech, Afternoon Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins..) (29 May 2010) http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427
[5] Anonymous, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies,” 10 May 2010. PDF without appendices: http://coto2.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/case_orange-5-10-2010-belfort-chemtrails.pdf
[6] High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, Fact Sheet, 15 Jun 2007. http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/factSheet.html
[7] Space Preservation Act of 2001, H.R.2977, 107th Congress, 1st Session. Introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich.
[8] Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter, “Conflicts of Interest: WHO and the pandemic ‘flu conspiracies,’” British Medical Journal 2010;340:c2912, 3 Jun 2010. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/jun03_4/c2912
[9] The Sunshine Project, “The Limits of Inside Pressure: The US Congress Role in ENMOD,” n.d. Accessed July 2010. http://www.sunshine-project.org/enmod/US_Congr.html
[10] United Nations, “Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques,” Resolution 31/72, 10 Dec 1976, effective 1978. Geneva. http://www.un-documents.net/enmod.htm
[11] Copenhagen Consensus Center, “Top economists recommend climate engineering,” 4 Sep 2009. Press release [pdf] http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fPress+Releases+2010%2fCC_PRESS_STATEMENT__4september2010_.pdf
[12] Catherine Brahic, “Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’,” New Scientist, 1 Sep 2009. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17716-top-science-body-calls-for-geoengineering-plan-b.html
[13] Donald K. Werle, et al., “Powder contrail generation,” U.S. Patent 3,899,144, 12 Aug 1975. Assignee: U.S. Secretary of the Navy. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3,899,144.PN.&OS=PN/3,899,144&RS=PN/3,899,144
[14] David L Mitchell and William Finnegan, “Modification of Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” Environmental Research Letters Vol. 4 No. 4, 30 Oct 2009. Available by subscription: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/4/045102
[15] David B. Chang and I-Fu Shih, “Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming,” U.S. Patent 5,003,186, 26 Mar 1991. Assignee: Hughes Aircraft Company. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,003,186.PN.&OS=PN/5,003,186&RS=PN/5,003,186
[16] Eli Kintisch, “Bill Gates Funding Geoengineering Research,” Science Insider, 26 Jan 2010. http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/01/bill-gates-fund.html.
[17] ETC Group, “Top-down Planet Hackers Call for Bottom-up Governance: Geoengineers’ Bid to Establish Voluntary Testing Regime Must Be Opposed,” 11 Feb 2010. http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/5073
[18] Food and Water Watch: http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/water/world-water/right/
[19] Col Tamzy J. House, et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,” Department of Defense U.S. Air Force, 17 Jun 1996. Publicly released August 1996. Reproduced at Federation of American Scientists: http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm
[20] Weather Modicaton Association website: http://www.weathermodification.org/
[21] Weather Modification Association, “Position Statement on the Environmental Impact of Using Silver Iodides as a Cloud Seeding Agent,” July 2009. http://www.weathermodification.org/AGI_toxicity.pdf
[22] World Meteorological Organization, “WMO Statement on Weather Modification,” UN Commission for Atmospheric Sciences Management Group, 26 Sep 2007. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/WM_statement_guidelines_approved.pdf
[23] Donald J. Travis, et al. “Contrails reduce daily temperature range,” Nature 418, 601, 8 Aug 2002. Reproduced by University of Washington, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences: http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~rennert/etc/courses/pcc587/ref/Travis-etal2002_Nature.pdf
[24] Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, “In-depth Review of the Work on Biodiversity and Climate Change, Draft Recommendation,” Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP/CBD/SBTTA/14/L.9, 15 May 2010. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-14/in-session/sbstta-14-L-09-en.pdf
[25] United States Code, Title 50, Chapter 32, “Chemical and Biological Warfare Program.” http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/50C32.txt
[26] James Rodger Fleming, “The pathological history of weather and climate modification: Three cycles of promise and hype,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2006. Available at http://www.colby.edu/sts/06_fleming_pathological.pdf
[27] Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American Heritage, 2005. http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml
[28] Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese, “The History of Radar,” BBC, 14 Jul 2003. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A591545
[29] Fleming, citing New York Times, 15 Nov 1946, 24.
[30] Squires, P. & Smith, E. J., “The Artificial Stimulation of Precipitation by Means of Dry Ice,” Australian Journal of Scientific Research, Series A: Physical Sciences, vol. 2, p.232, 1949AuSRA…2..232S, 1949. Republished at Harvard University: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1949AuSRA…2..232S/0000244.000.html
Also see: Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American Heritage, 2005. http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml
[31] Life Magazine, “Solution to Water Shortage: Rain makers’ success shows how New York could fill its reservoirs,” p. 113, 20 Feb 1950. http://snipurl.com/10oir8
[32] Life Magazine, “U.S. Water: We can supplement our outgrown sources at a price,” 21 Aug 1950, p. 52. http://snipurl.com/10oirc
[33] John Vidal and Helen Weinstein, “RAF rainmakers ’caused 1952 flood’: Unearthed documents suggest experiment triggered torrent that killed 35 in Devon disaster,” The Guardian, 30 Aug 2001. http://www.guardian.co.uk/silly/story/0,10821,544259,00.html
Also see: BBC News, “Rain-making link to killer floods,” 30 Aug 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1516880.stm
[34] Jerry E. Smith, “Weather Warfare: The Military’s Plan to Draft Mother Nature,” Adventures Unlimited Press, 2006. pp. 47-54. http://snipurl.com/10oiqw
[35] ibid. pp. 54-60.
[36] Richard Gray, “How we made the Chernobyl rain,” Daily Telegraph, 22 Apr 2007. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1549366/How-we-made-the-Chernobyl-rain.html
[37] Ian O’Neill, “The Chinese ‘Weather Manipulation Missile’ Olympics,” Universe Today, 12 Aug 2008. http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/12/the-chinese-weather-manipulation-missile-olympics/
[38] Anonymous, “Moscow Halo,” cell phone video uploaded to YouTube, 7 Oct 2009. reposted at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXF9HSB627U
October 3, 2011 at 1:16 am
I’m still following along but this new wordpress is not working i for me or is it ie 6??
Very strange occurance I will share. A sailboat burst into flames a couple of miles off the beach of Waikiki a couple of days ago. (See the coverage at KHON TV). That was strange enough but I’m certain some sort of craft hovered over the fire then suddenly disappeared. This object was silver and the helicopters that showed up later were black or glistened silver briefly. This was followed by the arrival of an F-18 which came and went and then followed by a Haarpified cloud formation and all within a half hour of the first sign of the 62 foot sailboat on fire.
October 7, 2011 at 11:20 pm
For the last four days or so the skies have been clear and blue, I was outside most of the time. I think I saw maybe four jet aircraft over the course of those four days..
Today at daybreak, all through the day and even into the night there have been more than a hundred jet aircraft leaving parallel lines and cris-crossing X’s All Over the once clear sky.
The entire “Armada” sailed across the skies here today.
October 11, 2011 at 12:06 am
It’s odd to me, that I never see one plane, other than the small Cessnas and here and there a “normal” passenger jet. Yet our skies are full of lacy looking chemclouds 24/7. We started out this morning w. clear blue skies and suddenly here they came, from the West and w.in minutes there was hardly any blue left, only streaks and lacy “clouds” til dark. They must be doing this over the ocean.. we never see any planes doing this. Mike Murphy is still at it, latest he succeeded doing is, getting something on the ballot in Mauii, that forbids ” geoingeneering”. He told me that they are trying to do this for CA next. Fat chance for this to happen. I think CA is the worst hit place in the world. Our deserts are clearer but not free from it either. And not even in the desert did I ever see a spraying plane. How do they do this? No planes, but the chemtrails are everywhere. Have an explanation for this, Clark, Founding??
October 11, 2011 at 4:53 pm
http://theintelhub.com/2011/10/11/why-in-the-world-are-they-spraying/… the latest from Michael Murphy !
October 29, 2011 at 2:59 am
What else are “they” doing?
Also, should I be posting this in the mass animal die off thread?
Modeling Airborne Chemical Releases: Ninety Tons Of Trouble Blowin’ In The Wind
October 27, 2011
Modeling Airborne Chemical Releases: Ninety Tons Of Trouble Blowin’ In The Wind
How do DHS experimenters release 4,000 pounds of deadly gas in 1 minute? Very, very carefully. …
Concerned about a potential toxic catastrophe, the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) Transportation Security Administration (TSA) launched a research program in 2008, dubbed Project Jack Rabbit, to model large-scale toxic chemical transport releases. …
As the cloud drifted, its key characteristics were tracked by a suite of high-tech eyes, ears, noses, and skin stationed near and far. For miles around, equipment had been placed to record the cloud’s unpredictable journey, its heading and speed, and temperature changes. …
http://www.chemicalonline.com/article.mvc/Modeling-Airborne-Chemical-Releases-Ninety-0001
November 1, 2011 at 12:03 am
I came across a photo showing basically what I try to describe as parallel lines in the sky from dozens of aircraft:
https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/s320x320/317404_2107002630362_1104445691_31765028_249745467_n.jpg
A Person made this comment about the photo:
“i see lines like the ones in the pic most every day in central kentucky.”
November 1, 2011 at 12:26 am
That photo is what I call the “classic” chemtrail pattern. They do those here as well.
This morning it was really bad. They had obviously started the spraying at night or around dawn. By 8:AM the skies were heavily, heavily saturated with chemtrails….the “mature” kind that had already spread out.
They were laying out “fresh” trails as well, clearly visible by their density and thin straight lines…then they too started spreading into the mess laid down earlier.
The US Government’s Chemtrail operation has GOT to be the most audacious, expensive, in-your-face-abomination ever foisted on the American People and yet maybe 1 person in a thousand even knows what a “chemtrail” is.
We are so screwed.
November 5, 2011 at 6:16 pm
Jim Rawles (JWR) at Survivalblog.com decided to weigh in against the idea of chemtrails, here is what he said, the link he mentions is fairly thorough, on another link there are some very old photos and descriptions of chemtrails:
JWR Replies: First, I must mention that I’ve concluded that chemtrails are an elaborate myth. (An example of Urban Folklore that has been debunked.) The technology needed to somehow infuse poisonous chemicals into the exhaust of jet engines would be impossible to hide. Ditto for the transport and decanting of the umpteen tanks of toxic chemicals. The legions of mechanics and truck drivers needed to carry out this alleged conspiracy out would have surely seen it, and the equipment would have long ago have been photographed. Those photos would be all over the Internet. We need to put this myth to rest, once and for all.
http://www.survivalblog.com/2011/11/letter_re_uses_for_colloidal_s.html
November 10, 2011 at 7:06 pm
Chemtrails as Weather Modification Traded for Profit as Derivatives on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange
November 9th, 2011 Posted by Harold Saive
Michael Murphy, Co-Producer of “What in the World are They Spraying?” investigates a connection between Chemtrails as weather modification and profits from derivative trading on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME).
… he discovered that the weather – including consequences of violent weather, flooding amd storms – are traded as derivatives on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. This investigation links weather control to chemtrail/geoengineering programs and illustrates how governments and corporations can profit by controlling our weather and making Wall Street wagers on the deadly outcomes. …
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2011/11/09/chemtrails-as-weather-modification-traded-for-profit-as-derivatives-on-the-chicago-mercantile-exchange/
Here is the pre-view of the film, Why In The World Are They Spraying?:
November 23, 2011 at 1:44 am
“The Santa Barbara County water agency is telling the world that it plans to conduct a weather modification program and it is explaining exactly how it will be done.” …
Ho hum, they’re doing the same in Texas too:
“According to the Texas state government, these weather modification projects have been going on down in Texas since the year 2000.” …
http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/solid-proof-that-weather-modification-projects-are-being-conducted-all-over-the-united-states
A comment from the article:
“I live in Canyon, Tx… 20 miles south of Amarillo, and I can tell you the spraying of the aerosl chemtrails into the sky is nonstop around here. There are literally days when you can walk outside and see an entire grid arrayed across the sky overhead.”
Another:
“Condensation trails do not spread out into a solid sheet of overcast and stay all day, sorry. I’m in Arizona, and watch the planes grid the sky to build massive cloud banks all the time. It’s not only rain making..someone has sold the idea that “global warming” could be stopped by making artificial clouds. Someone is making a lot of money, they’re really busy out here in the desert. …”
This was a funny comment, as if one is real and the other is not, because…? :
“Conspiracy non-sense! Cloud seeding and ionization are methods of enhancing rainfall. Old Stuff! Chemtrails are pure conspiracy theory non-sense.”
Heh, it’s kind of funny, Dude is *still* at it:
AntiLieGuy
November 21st, 2011 at 5:16 pm · Reply
“They are spraying to hide Planet X. That is why they spray every day globally. Everything else you hear is lies.”
November 28, 2011 at 11:22 pm
Today it looked as if the sky was totally veiled, so much so, there was no blue left whatsoever. Worse yet, it stunk.. like car-emission, and I suddenly felt so tired, it was paralizing. Still have to check w. the kids if they felt this fatigue too.
It has never been thicker than today, and I saw 1 plane the criss crossed all of it and put some stripes into that stinking soup !
November 30, 2011 at 7:50 pm
Thanx..I was really worried about Dude…LOL
Check this out http://www.illuminati.org
hold down the control key and press “a”
Mac users need to capture the entire screen to view the hidden message.
November 30, 2011 at 9:19 pm
Hi Eric,
I too was relieved to see Clark’s post reporting that the “Dude” was still actively warning of impending doom via Nibiru.
People say there are only two constants in the Universe: Death and Taxes. I say there are three: Death, Taxes and the Dude’s monomania on Nibiru!
I did check out the link you posted to “illuminati.org”
Two questions come to mind:
1) How did you find the site and
2) How in the world did you figure out the “control + a” to reveal the secret squirrel message?
Very curious about that site. Guess we will find out soon enough, but I appreciate any insight you can share.
Regards,
FoundingFather1776
PS
They continue to chemtrail the crap out of our skies here on the East Coast, just in case anyone was afraid that maybe they stopped. Fear not.
December 7, 2011 at 7:20 pm
This was pretty good, referenced at infowars:
NANO CHEMTRAILS
by William Thomas
“If you did not enjoy “traditional” chemtrails raining down on you, you are not going to like the new version, which the United States Air Force promises will feature aerial dumps of programmable “smart” molecules tens of thousands of times smaller than the particles already landing people in emergency rooms with respiratory, heart and gastrointestinal complaints.
Under development since 1995,…
For public consumption, nano-weather control jargon has been sanitized. “Microelectric Mechanical Sensors” (MMS) and “Global Environmental Mechanical Sensors” sound passively benign. But these ultra-tiny autonomous aerial vehicles are neither M&Ms nor gems. [Space.com Oct 31/05]
According to a U.S. military flier called Military Progress, “The green light has been given” to disperse swarms of wirelessly-networked nano-bots into the troposphere by remotely-controlled UAV drones for “global warming mitigation.”
U.S. Army Tactical Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, as well as U.S. Air Force drones “are slated to deploy various payloads for weather warfare,” Military Progress asserts. This dual mission – to slow global warming and use weather as a weapon – seems somewhat contradictory. …
NANO RAIN
Meanwhile, the 60 year quest for weather warfare continues. Though a drone cannot carry a heavy payload, more sub-microscopic weather modification particles can be crammed into a UAV Predator than all the chemtrail slurry packed into a tanker the size of a DC-10. T
According to the air force’s own weather modification study, Owning The Weather 2025, clouds of these extremely teeny machines will be dropped into hurricanes and other weather systems to blend with storms and report real time weather data to each other and a larger sensor network.
Then these smart particles will be used to increase or decrease the storm’s size and intensity – and “steer” it to “specific targets”.
The air force report boasted that nano-chemtrails “will be able to adjust their size to optimal dimensions for a given seeding situation and make adjustments throughout the process.” Instead of being sprayed into the air at the mercy of the winds aloft, as is the fate of normal chemtrails, nano versions will be able to “enhance their dispersal” by “adjusting their atmospheric buoyancy” and “communicating with each other” as they steer themselves in a single coordinated flock within their own artificial cloud.
Nano-chemtrails will even “change their temperature and polarity to improve their seeding effects,” the air force noted. [Daily Texan July 30/07]
Rutgers University scientist J. Storrs Hall held out the military’s hope that these new nano weather-warrior bots: “Interconnected, atmospherically buoyant, and having navigation capability in three dimensions – clouds of microscopic computer particles communicating with each other and with a control system, could provide tremendous capability.” …
“It is potentially relatively inexpensive to do,” Hall clarified. “About the same price per pound as potatoes.” …”
http://willthomasonline.net/Nano_Chemtrails.html
December 12, 2011 at 7:45 pm
the illuminati.org site was pointing to Dec. 7. So what happened? We lost our soverignity. The U.S. and Canada merged. This creates the requirement posed in 1984, for one of the three nations which controlled it’s lands from sea to sea to sea. If you have a totalitarian state, it is prerequisite that this land has no loopholes ie, no escape.
As a result of this change in status, I have purchased a new website which is not up yet but will detail the ongoing process of creating the totalitarian http://www.northamerica.xxx.
December 21, 2011 at 11:21 am
An example of wireless power transmission in action, and some other spooky stuff:
HSV Technologies Inc., formerly of San Diego, California is developing a non-lethal weapon that uses ultraviolet laser beams to harmlessly immobilize people and animals at a distance. The Phaser-like device uses two beams of UV radiation to ionize paths in the air along which electrical current is conducted to and from the target. In effect, the beams create wires through the atmosphere wherever they are pointed.
http://www.hsvti.com/
Some bits I find interesting from their FAQ:
The prototype is being developed for us by a laser manufacturer.
Although it is not our intent to inflict pain, if the current were increased and the optimal pulse repetition rate were lowered to 2 or 3 pulses per second, the affected person would feel painful shocks.
Could you make these weapons lethal?
* We have no intention of doing so. They were created to save lives, not to take them. Perhaps one of the end-users would do this, but it would be without our knowledge or approval.
[Was that proof there is a heart attack causing gun in existence?]
Would it be dangerous to point it at a storm cloud?
* As would be true with any good conductor, it would be extremely dangerous to point this device toward a storm cloud.
The very weak current we use is able to hold the major skeletal muscles contracted because it closely replicates the nerve impulses that control those muscles. That is, the combination of the pulse wave form, the pulse repetition rate, and the amperage is exactly designed to mimic the neural pulses nature uses to activate those muscles. Only the voltage is greater so that the current will penetrate clothing and skin.
How far can you project the tetanizing effect?
* With an ultraviolet wavelength of 193 nanometers, the maximum effective range is about 100 meters. The effective range increases to two kilometers when a wavelength of 248 nanometers and a more intense beam are used.
Why are only the skeletal muscles tetanized?
* The skeletal muscles are held immobile because they are composed of striated or “stringy” muscle tissue. Striated muscle tissue is easily stimulated by electrical currents. On the other hand, heart muscle is affected only by significantly more powerful currents. Thus, this difference in sensitivity is a natural safety factor.
How do you get the electrical current to the target?
* The electrical current is conducted through two channels of ionized air between the device and the target. The channels are created by two laser beams having a wavelength in the far-ultraviolet region, such as of 193 or 248 nanometers.
Why doesn’t the current in the ionized channels jump to ground before it reaches the target?
* The current cannot flow to ground because it is surrounded by a strong insulating material, air. Un-ionized air is an excellent electrical insulator (dielectric), as its breakdown potential is about 38,000 volts per centimeter. Also, the recombination time between the liberated electrons and their parent oxygen ions is measured in microseconds. Therefore, the electrons are able to travel only a few nanometers outside the ultraviolet beam before being absorbed, thus preventing the formation of any conductive paths to ground.
How does photoionization make air electrically conductive?
* Photoionization is the process by which particles or wave-packets of electromagnetic energy called photons, in this case ultraviolet photons, bombard and dislodge electrons from the molecules of oxygen they strike. The electrons are then free to move as a current whenever they are subjected to an electrical potential. (A flow of electrons is an electrical current.)
Does altitude affect the ionized channels?
* The lower air density at higher altitudes increases the efficiency of the ionization process. To the point where the oxygen is too tenuous to be an adequate source of electrons, the liberated electrons have a longer mean free path in less dense air.
Could this technique be used to make a laser lightning rod?
* Several types of laser lightning rods have already been designed. For further information, you may read on the internet the papers of Jean-Claude Diels and Bruno La Fontaine, among others.
# Are the beams affected by atmospheric conditions?
* Even the strongest wind is not a problem because the recombination time between the liberated electrons and their parent O2 ions is extremely rapid, on the order of microseconds (depending on the energy imparted to them). Therefore, the electrons are able to travel only a few nanometers outside the ultraviolet beam before being absorbed. The ionized channels thus remain straight and steady no matter how powerful the wind.
On the other hand, heavy rain and fog are a major problem because the electron attachment rate to water vapor is quite high. However, it may be possible to overcome that difficulty by using a coaxial beam of infrared radiation to heat the supersaturated air.
Chemtrails and scalar weaponry, anyone?
Yeesh, and I found this at Survivalblog, the author of which recently claimed chemtrails were a hoax,… psft.
December 28, 2011 at 2:11 pm
As I was saying, Dec. 7 was pointing to this event..
http://canada.usembassy.gov/canada-us-relations/border-issues/beyond-the-border-a-new-strategy.html
The fact that you don’t know anything about this and no one is talking about it is all the evidence you need to be suspect of just what the hell they are spraying on us.. Best of the best in 2012.
http://tv.globalresearch.ca/2011/12/end-nations-canada-us-and-security-perimeter
January 3, 2012 at 3:38 pm
Do you suppose chemtrails are created in a way similar to how natural clouds are formed by cosmic rays from space as described in a previous “official” link above?
It seems simple enough to take a drone aircraft fitted with an air intake tube punctured with metal rods to focus laser beams at to affect the air going through the tubes while a fine mist or spray is simultaneously applied to re-create the conditions of cosmic rays from space hitting earth’s atmosphere producing an expanding cloud. Do you suppose that’s possible?
It would certainly help those who think tons of liquid being sprayed into the atmosphere is a logistical impossibility. It may only take a little. Doing so for a long period could produce results on the ground showing high concentrations of the mist or spray that is used very sparingly.
Perhaps in the past (1930′s – 1940′s) they used electrically charged rods to heat the air rather than lasers? It all kind of fits together, imho.
What’s in the mist or spray is a whole nother question.
Also, I forgot to mention, for the sake of newcomers and skeptics (if there are any?) the day before this last Thanksgiving Day the skies were clear and blue all day here. I saw about eight aircraft the whole day.
Now, the day before Thanksgiving Day is supposed to be the busiest travel day of the year and yet Only eight aircraft fly overhead while on other non-event days there have been hundreds of aircraft. What’s that say to you?
Do you suppose this means many of these aircraft are not commercial flights – and if so – what’s the purpose of so many aircraft flying overhead in such a strange way and in such large numbers?
January 10, 2012 at 7:38 am
January 30, 2012 at 5:57 am
Thanx again Clark. It won’t be long now and Vitamin D3 goes the way of us ducks. Costco refuses to sell it anymore. You can still get Vitamin D everywhere but the fact of the matter is that we need D3 which is an activated agent of the vitamin that addresses immediate needs in the body.
February 2, 2012 at 1:05 am
All vitamins, eh ericswan? Like seniors denying freshmen?
“Costco refuses to sell it anymore” – that’s something.
A few more links and videos:
http://www.latenightinthemidlands.com/profiles/blogs/chemtrails-may-contain-bio-engineered-rfid-chips-in-the-form-of-n
February 2, 2012 at 1:06 am
February 2, 2012 at 1:06 am
http://preventdisease.com/news/12/011712_Look-Up-The-New-Age-of-Inoculation-is%20Aerial-Vaccines-and-Nano-Delivery-Systems.shtml
February 2, 2012 at 1:07 am
February 2, 2012 at 1:07 am
http://axisoflogic.com/artman/publish/Article_64217.shtml
February 2, 2012 at 1:08 am
February 2, 2012 at 1:08 am
http://worldgathering.net/2009b/news183.html
February 2, 2012 at 1:17 am
People are starting to catch on?:
U.S. Army Dispersed Zinc Cadmium Sulfide Over U.S. Cities in the 1950s and 1960s
“This is old news, but it was news to me…”
http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/104030.html
February 6, 2012 at 2:19 pm
Your last 26 days of life…
On March 2, 2012, the zionists (isreali mossad and cia agents) who are the stooges of the central banksters, will attack an American naval ship (as they did with the USS Liberty).
They will try to sink this ship with a huge loss of life of American sailors.
They will pretend to be Iranians to make you mad at Iran.
They intend to provoke officialdom in the US and Russia and China into killing us all.
Much of officialdom (masons, illuminati, agents of rome (opus dei et al), zionists) are in on this false flag attack, and their fervent hope for WAR to end your life, and the lives of over ONE BILLION other humans (your relatives on this planet).
So much of humanity on this planet has been made crazy by the rothchilds/rockefellers and all the priests/potentates and other assholes who put themselves on top of us all by lying and cheating and murder.
They plan on yet another fucking great war to kill off as many of us as they can.
If they succeed, and the war is created;
no more taxes will i pay ever to anyone.
no more of their laws will i obey.
if i survive the smoking, nuclear wasteland that will be the west coast of the USofA and most of earth, and there are any of the former central banksters and their masters alive, i will swear the remnant of my life to bringing them to justice. And i know what that means, even if the psychopathic pedofilic fucktards do not.
My message to them…all of officialdom is simple….you know fear. You live on the fear of others. Now it is your turn.
Fear us now.
We know you now.
Your names are recorded.
Your lives are in our hands.
Killing billions of us only convinces the rest that we have nothing left to lose.
You taught us to fear you.
Now the fear is gone, only hate remains.
Fear us now.
Or we come for you later.
posted February 6, 2012 by clif high
February 15, 2012 at 10:19 pm
What up? Same posters here from a couple years ago. The chemtrails are hiding Planet X. The war of Armageddon will be this Oct 10, the ninth year of Putin’s reign as president. Everything is going according to the gods’ plans that they laid out centuries ago. Also, Enki is back, the god responsible for genetically engineering the human slave race:
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/inter2011/italy/Poirino2011a.html