Archive for June, 2009

Top 5 Most Sinister Corporate Logos

June 22, 2009
Research By “Vigilant”

(FoundingFather1776 Notes: Vigilant’s website can be found here: http://vigilantcitizen.com/ I highly recommend you check it out!)

Big corporations pay millions in public relations to make customers associate their brand with a warm and fuzzy feeling. It is imperative that the soulless and inherently greedy nature of the corporation be hidden behind a family-friendly facade. But some companies just don’t give a hoot. They hate you, your family and especially your cat and they don’t care if you know it. They even display their evilness right on their logo. Here is my top 5 of most sinister logos.

#5- Alfa Romeo

Yes, I agree they make great looking European cars. But look closely at the logo. Why is there a  snake eating a little terrified guy on it? I mean me personally, I’m a human, not a giant snake-dragon. So the fact that a snake is eating a person is unsettling for me because I tend to identify with the person and not the giant crowned snake. If you look at the logo’s history, the ancient ones depicted the guy in a more vivid way.

In older logos, the little guy is in different color, still waving his arms in a seemingly desperate cry for help

In older logos, the little guy is in different color, still waving his arms in a seemingly desperate cry for help

The official story of the logo is that Romano Cattaneo was given the task to come up with a badge for the then new company, in 1910. While waiting for a train at Piazza Castello in Milan, he gained inspiration from the Visconti family’s coat of arms displayed on a door. It features a “biscione” which is a serpent eating a human child.  It reportedly terrified the local populous of Milan in the early part of the 5th century A.D. It has been said that the human being eaten is a Moor, during the Crusades. If that’s the case, who or what does the serpent symbolize?

Coat of arm’s at Milan Central Station. That nasty looking serpent is eating a child… Or is it giving birth to it? Can it represent the Bloodline?

Coat of arm’s at Milan Central Station. That nasty looking serpent is eating a child… Or is it giving birth to it? Can it represent the Bloodline?

Some esoteric authors claim that the serpent is actually a kundalini (shakra snake) eating the material nature of man, thus signifying esoteric initiation. It is possible. But why was this symbol placed on Berlusconi’s front lawn?

Sylvio Berlusconi’s front lawn with man-eating serpent symbol.

Sylvio Berlusconi’s front lawn with man-eating serpent symbol.

The people at redicecreations.com have appropriately noticed that this symbol had been used in numerous documents throughout History such as Aztek drawings and alchemical engravements. The logo today seems to have taken a definitive elitist meaning, due to its usage by noble families, big corporations and even pseudo-dictators such as Berlusconi.

While we’re talking about snakes eating people, why do I keep coming across art that portrays reptiles overpowering humans?

Vigeland Park, Oslo. Look at its creepy face.

Vigeland Park, Oslo. Look at its creepy face.

Vigeland Park, Oslo. How about a sculpture of me punching one of those things in the face?

Vigeland Park, Oslo. How about a sculpture of me punching one of those things in the face?

Waddesdon Manor (Rothschild Estate), England

Waddesdon Manor (Rothschild Estate), England

Maybe I should ask David Icke for his take on the subject…

#4- Vodaphone

This logo has been criticized because there are three 6s hidden in it.  Can you see them?

This logo has been criticized because there are three 6's hidden in it. Can you see them?

As you might know, 666 is the biblical number of the Beast in the Book of  Revelation. It is associated with Satan, the Antichrist and Bob Saget (little humor here).  Students of occult numerology learn that 666 refers to the material man, who is driven by his lowest impulses. He is thus similar to a beast and consequently embodies his own worst enemy. Whatever signification people attribute to the triple 6, it is always extremely negative. The good people at Vodafone however love  it to a point that they use it all over their advertisements:

Another interesting yet disturbing fact is the uncanny resemblance of the Vodafone logo with the one of the KKK.

Vodafone logo looks exactly like the KKK blood drop

The 6 of Vodaphone is similar to the blood drop from the Klu Klux Klan symbol. Are we again referring to a bloodline? So, yup, there’s something terribly wrong with that logo.

#3- Council of Foreign Relations

The Council of Foreign Relations is not a corporation but this logo has to be discussed here. If you know anything about international politics or the plan for a New World Order, you surely know about the CFR. It is has been named “the most influential foreign policy think tank in the world” by international journalists. The list of its members is astonishing, to say the least, as it includes gigantic names in the corporate, financial and political world. Some examples of corporations: ABC News, American Express, Boeing, Coca-Cola, Ford Motor, Google, Halliburton, Heinz, IBM, Nike, Sony Corporation America and Visa. Examples of members: Barack Obama, Zbigniew Brzezinski (Obama’s advisor), Hilary Clinton, Dick Cheney, John McCain and David Rockefeller. Many authors have observed that these figures are working towards a world government and many members haven’t denied this fact. Recently, Obama has chosen the president of the Council on Foreign Relations Richard Haass, along with senior CFR-members Richard Holbrooke and  Dennis Ross as special Foreign Envoys/ Foreign Policy Advisors.

On the logo we see a naked man riding an angry horse and flashing some sort of medieval gang sign. Is this the type of guy you would ask for advice concerning international politics? No. Well, maybe you would just for kicks. The figure on the logo contain many symbols that need deciphering.

The white horse on the logo is most probably a reference to the first horse of the Book of Revelation. The biblical passages goes as follows:

“And I saw, and behold a white horse;
and he that sat on him had a bow;
and a crown was given unto him:
and he went forth conquering, and
to conquer”

-Revelation 6,2

The man sitting on the horse is naked, symbolizing the fact that he is wild and thus have no cultural affiliation. He is flashing the “Sign of Admiration”, one of the many occult hand signs the elite keep waving at your face without you realizing it. Here’s Napoleon (Freemason and Illuminist) making the same sign.

Masonic documentation state that this sign is part of the rituals of the 6th degree.

Screen Shot of Duncans Masonic Ritual and Monitor , Malcolm C. Duncan

Screen Shot of "Duncan's Masonic Ritual and Monitor" , Malcolm C. Duncan

During this same ritual,  members are asked to repeat “For he is good” six times, then say “for he meroy endureth forever‘” six times. They  are finally asked to rise and balance six times. Draw your own conclusions on the meaning of this ritual. Here’s what Texe Marrs say on the subject:

“The hand/arm salute of the CFR’s naked man atop the white horse, in Masonic textbooks, is called the “Sign of Admiration.” Its explanation is bound up in the ancient pagan temple rituals of Israel’s apostate King Solomon. In reality, this sign is the occult salute of those who are of the Synagogue of Satan. The salute is made in honor of their leader and king, Lucifer, whom the Scriptures call, the “Prince of the Power of the Air.”

Is he totally out of line or barely scratching the surface?

Finally on the CFR logo, we find the saying “Ubique”, which means “Everywhere”. Can this be anymore Big Brother-ish? In other words, you can’t escape the wild naked rider. He might present himself as a man of peace on his white horse but he represents the occult cabal plotting against your best interests.

#2- Bechtel

I don’t need to go into occult symbolism for this logo. It’s just blatant and in your face. It looks like the logo of a villain in a Saturday morning TV cartoon. Why are the oceans red on the logo? Are they filled with the blood of the innocent or something? I mean what are we supposed to think? And why are the continents grey? Are they completely paved with concrete? I especially like the way “Bechtel” is stamped over the planet as if it was saying “We own this place, get the hell off our propriety”. If you don’t know about this mega construction and engineering company, learn about it because it is literally all over the world.

“Evil corporation” is a cliché and slightly annoying expression used by the corny branch of the liberals. But, trust me, it really applies here. Here are a couple of exploits accomplished by this great organization (all citations are from Wikipedia):

Stealing water from poor people:

The Bechtel vs. Bolivia case is round two of a fight over something basic: water. Two years ago Bechtel took over the public water system of Bolivia’s third-largest city, Cochabamba, and within weeks raised rates by as much as 200 percent, far beyond what families there could afford. When the company refused to lower rates, the public revolted. Widespread protests eventually forced Bechtel to leave.

Building chemical plant for Saddam Hussein:

In 1988, just after Saddam Hussein had earned international condemnation for using poisonous gas against thousands of Kurds, Bechtel signed contracts with Iraq to build a chemical plant.

Profiting from the fall of Saddam Hussein:

Critics in both the United States and allies like Britain have questioned the process by which the U.S. awarded Iraq contracts to American companies. The profiteering from the destruction caused by the shock and awe at the beginning of the war has caused Bechtel to be accused of disaster capitalism

Profiting from hurricane Katrina:

In 2005, Bechtel was awarded a no-bid contract by the Federal Emergency Management Agency to install temporary housing for the Hurricane Katrina disaster relief effort. The lack of competitive bidding for the contracts was criticized, as was the high cost of the contracts and the failure to support local, minority-owned businesses.

There are many more pretty examples. Also, read on Bechtel’s environmental record. It might explain why the water is red and the earth is grey on their logo.

1- Procter and Gamble

This is the mother of all sinister occult logos. It has it all. The corporation (who manufactures a great portion of your household products) has faced much controversy during the 1980’s because of the dark symbolism of its logo. Due to his bad reputation, the “Moon Man” doesn’t appear on products anymore but he is still on Procter & Gamble stock certificates as of this date, and also at the entrance of some P&G facilities.

The logo features a moon crescent with a human face on it. In occult symbolism, a human face on a celestial body typifies it as a deity. The moon is usually portrayed as a goddess because of its receptive nature. In this case, who is this mysterious masculine deity? Some clues concerning its identity are hidden inside the logo. First, look at each end of the moon crescent..two horns. Don’t jump out the window yet. Look under the face of the moon, near the circle…there’s an inverted 666. OK, now you can jump out the window.

There are exactly 13 stars in the logo, an important number in esoteric (especially masonic) numerology. In their lawsuit against Amway, P&G claimed that the 13 stars referred to the 13 colonies of the US. I’m sorry, but that is 100% BULL-CRAP. You might convince  bribed judges or morons of this idiotic explanation, but any knowledgeable person in occultism realizes that this logo isn’t just a collection of random cool looking things, as they might claim. There are clear astrotheological and esoteric symbols in this logo, who make it reminiscent of  images found in ancient Black Magic books.

P&G has filed numerous lawsuits against its detractors and recently won against Amway. Some might say “OK case closed, the judge decided that it wasn’t occult. I can now go back to listening to Lady Gaga”. Some however still trust their own judgment.

To Conclude

If you believe there’s a logo that should be here, be sure to post it in the comments sections. A big part of this analysis is personal interpretation, based on research using esoteric documents who are studied by the occult elite. You might agree or not with my conclusions but I don’t really care. The ultimate goal is to encourage people to examine their surroundings and ask “why”…maybe even doing some research would be a bonus. If more people could take this step and actually be interested in what surrounds them, our society’s collective mind would be a little less driven by “dumb-ass” based philosophy.  The rewards of this change would be incredible. Meanwhile, back to my Lady Gaga.

What the hell are they spraying on us? PART 2

June 10, 2009

This is the spot to continue your comments regarding chemtrails and other information of interest.

Click HERE to see the chemtrail pictures taken by “Ursa Major” – very good work documenting the obvious chemical spraying.

Here is a recent YouTube clip posted by some outraged Oregon residents as their tiny town gets saturation sprayed (thanks to Stef for the link):

Another regular commentator here that goes by “Dude” has created a detailed document that he believes explains the reason for chemtrails.  His theories may be controversial, but he has done a lot of research and I will post the link here so that those of you that want to find it easily can do so.  The link to Dude’s article:

http://www.scribd.com/doc/16612974/War-News

Regards,

FoundingFather1776

England’s Jewish Aristocracy

June 10, 2009

(FoundingFather1776 Notes: If you are a new reader, or if you have accidentally stumbled across this blog, you might assume that because we publish the articles below, this blog is somehow “anti-semitic” – your assumption would be greatly mistaken.

We deal in the TRUTH here.  There are no sacred cows.  Trying to deny that the most powerful Jewish family in the world; the Rothschilds, have an inordinate control on international finance and intertwined themselves with British aristocracy is as ludicrous as denying that the Klu Klux Klan has white members!

And before you shoot the messenger, please keep another thing in mind.  Not only is Dr. Henry Makow a thorough and accurate researcher of the “New World Order” gang ……..he is also Jewish!)

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Did you know that Simon Cowell, the acerbic judge on American Idol, is half-Jewish?

British Jews keep a low profile but they are extremely influential.  Similarly, it is hardly known that the British aristocracy largely is half-Jewish too, and that, in the words of L.G. Pine, Editor of Burke’s Peerage, “the Jews have made themselves so closely connected with the British peerage that the two classes are unlikely to suffer loss which is not mutual.” (219)

This is confirmed by British social critic Hilaire Belloc who described the British Empire as a partnership between Jewish finance and the British aristocracy.

“After Waterloo [1815] London became the money market and the clearing house of the world. The interests of the Jew as a financial dealer and the interests of this great commercial polity approximated more and more. One may say that by the last third of the nineteenth century, they had become virtually identical.”   (“The Jews” 1922)

In the next few articles, I am going to explore the thesis that the British Empire was a Masonic proxy, and that British & American imperialism derived its moxie from the perverse desire of Cabalist bankers to own and control everything. The Illuminati bankers (i.e. the “Crown”) colonized England & the US as well as the world.  The “Jewish Conspiracy” was the British Empire  now repackaged as the New World Order. Of course, now it encompasses everyone with a stake in “globalism.”

Before I commence this heavy lifting, it being the weekend, I want to regale you with Pine’s amusing account of “Jewish infiltration into the aristocracy.” ( “The Anglo Jewish Peerage” in  “Tales of the British Aristocracy” 1956, pp.217-223.)

Pine is outspoken in a way few people are today. He says that for every Rothschild or Disraeli, there were “10 cases of Jewish connection which are now forgotten. The reason is that in many cases “Jewish origin is concealed.” (218)

The marriage of Jewish finance and British aristocracy took place literally. Spendthrift gentry married the daughters of rich Jews.

Pine is scornful of the British aristocracy: “A man is not usually thought the more of, because he has married a woman for her money…An ancient estate is likely to be sold unless some large sums are found. The sums are found from marriage with a Jewish heiress…”

An outstanding example is the marriage of the 5th Earl of Roseberry who married the only daughter and heiress of Baron Mayer de Rothschild and later became Prime Minister.  “She stayed in the Jewish religion but her children were educated as Christians…The alliances between Jewish ladies and British lords are mostly of this type, the wife providing large sums…while the aristocrat has the title and ancient estate. The children are able to look back upon a varied bag of ancestors.”

Pine obviously does not approve of these parvenus: “There can be no question that the British Peerage is now very much diluted with Jewish blood and has many connections among its most ancient and august families with those who only a few generations ago were inhabitants of the Ghetto.”

But he opines that England’s enfeebled elite may need this protection from the “forces of revolution”:

“The power of money is very great and as almost every liberal newspaper is under Jewish influence it follows that the forces of revolution when directed against the peers are likely to meet with as determined an opposition from the Jewish kinfolk of the aristocracy…”

L.G. Pine needn’t worry about the “forces of revolution” since they were created by Jewish finance to concentrate power and wealth in their own hands. This will find its apogee in the New World Order.

CONCLUSION

The “Jewish Conspiracy” may indeed be the British Empire, and the “Jews” may in fact be the Masonic British aristocracy who regard themselves as Jews, and often are. They consider themselves one of the lost tribes of Israel, the real “Chosen People.”  The word “Brit” apparently derives from the Hebrew for “pact” or “covenant” ( i.e. the Jewish Covenant with God.) Members of the British royal family are circumcised by a Jewish mohel.

All I can say is, the Tribe is not what I thought!

Illuminati Bankers Instigated World War One

by Henry Makow Ph.D.

When we left off, we were exploring the proposition that the New World Order is the British Empire repackaged, and this empire was literally a marriage of effete British aristocracy and virile (or virulent) Jewish finance.

Webster Tarpley is a gifted historian who generally eschews mention of Jewish bankers in favor of euphemisms like “Venetians.”  Therefore it is unusual for him to state bluntly that King Edward VII was in the pay of the Rothschilds and was responsible for World War One.

Edward VII didn’t become king until 1901 when he was 60 years old. As Prince of Wales, he was estranged from his mother,  kept on an allowance and deeply in debt. He allowed a “series of Jewish bankers to manage his personal finances.”  These included Baron von Hirsch and Sir Ernest Cassell. “Edward also cultivated the Rothschild and Sassoon families. In short, Edward’s personal household finance agency was identical with the leading lights of turn-of-the-century Zionism.”
(King Edward VII: Evil Demiurge of the Triple Entente & WW1.)Tarpley is equally forthright in stating that “Edward VII, far more than any other single human being, was the author of the First World War…the most destructive single event in the history of Western civilization” which opened the door to Communism, Fascism, the Great Depression and World War Two.  Tarpley falls into the trap of establishment historians by attributing great events to single personalities. These personalities are invariably puppets of the people who pay their bills.

Tarpley goes into some detail about how King Edward and his Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey, the son of Edward’s horse master, engineered World War One. Essentially, they  deceived Germany into believing that England would remain neutral. To prevent the war, all they had to do was clarify this point. Germany would have backed down and reined in Austria.

In August 1914, Kaiser Wilhelm realized he had been fooled: “England, Russia and France have agreed among themselves … to take the Austro-Serbian conflict as an excuse for waging a war of extermination against us…That is the real naked situation slowly & cleverly set going by Edward VII…The net has been suddenly thrown over our heads, and England sneeringly reaps the most brilliant success of her persistently prosecuted anti-German world policy against which we have proved ourselves helpless, while she twists the noose of our political and economic destruction out of our fidelity to Austria, as we squirm isolated in the net.”

BACKGROUND

“England’s” animosity against Germany was part of an agenda to use a catastrophic war to undermine Western civilization, and advance the Judeo-Masonic New World Order. Three empires disappeared in that inferno while Communism and Zionism rose like the phoenix.

The decadent British aristocracy is totally complicit in the cabalistic bankers’ plan to degrade and enslave mankind. Who are these “aristocrats?”  In an essay, “Breeding Concubines,”  Greg Hallett makes some astonishing, some might say ridiculous, claims. I present them here without judgment, to be proven or discredited as evidence emerges.

Edward VII was the mentally deficient product of the marriage between Queen Victoria and her first cousin Albert. He was the oldest male of her nine children. He married in 1863 and had five legitimate children between 1864 and 1869. His eldest son, Clarence, was mentally deranged and the prime suspect in the Jack the Ripper murders.

Edward VII routinely and openly cheated on his wife. He had dozens of mistresses, some as young as age 14. One of these was the Jewish-born Lady Randolph Jennie Jerome Churchill. Hallett believes Edward VII was Winston Churchill’s real father.

Hallett claims that Queen Victoria had children with Lionel de Rothschild and that two of Edward’s sisters, Helena and Beatrice, were Rothschilds.  He claims the British Royal family is “a biological, financial and moral subset of the Rothschild international bankers.”

“Interbreeding amongst the British royal family over generations has created concubines, illegitimate children and agents of war. The British Royal family are then shamed by these events  and then manipulated into any activity their owners require…This gave [the Rothschilds] consummate power over the British Royal family, and any others they interbred with, which was all the royal families of Europe…” (“Breeding Concubines” in “Stalin’s British Training,” 2007, pp. 1-38.)

CONCLUSION

These claims seem far fetched yet it is plain to see that something is wrong with the Royals. It is widely acknowledged that Edward VII was dissolute. If Hallet’s claim that “the British Royal family are a subset of the Rothschild family and are utilized as part of the Rothschild business as a money-making venture to create war,”  it would explain King Edward VII’s role in starting World War One.

The reports of homosexuality, drugs, pederasty, promiscuity, occultism in the history of the British aristocracy are consistent with what we know about the Illuminati.  They are depraved yet somehow able to subvert mankind without serious resistance.

What a tawdry tale is modern history! Instead of grasping greatness within reach, the human race is paralyzed by the morbid spell of a Satanic cult, the Cabalist (Illuminati) bankers.

Federal Reserve Cannot Account for $9 Trillion

June 8, 2009

By: Julie Crawshaw

NewsMax.com

The Federal Reserve apparently can’t account for $9 trillion in off-balance sheet transactions.

When Rep. Alan Grayson (D-Orlando) asked Inspector General Elizabeth Coleman of the Federal Reserve some very basic questions about where the trillions of dollars that have come from the Fed’s expanded balance sheet, the IG didn’t know.

Worse, nobody at the Fed seems to have any idea what the losses on its $2 trillion portfolio really are.

“I am shocked to find out that nobody at the Federal Reserve is keeping track of anything,” Grayson says.

Grayson asked Coleman if her agency had done any research into the decision not to save Lehman Brothers, which “sent shockwaves through the entire financial system,” Coleman said it had not.

“What about the $1 trillion plus expansion of the Federal reserve’s balance sheet since last September?” Grayson asked.

“We have different connotations,” Coleman replied. “We’re actually conducting a fairly high-level review of the various lending facilities collectively.”

Translation: Nobody at the Fed knows where the money went.

Do you know what who got the $1 trillion or more in the Fed’s expansion of its balance, Grayson pressed.

“I do not know. We have not looked at this specific area at the particular point on that specific review,” Coleman answer.

What about the trillions of off-balance transactions since last September, Grayson asked.

Coleman demurred again, saying the IG does not have jurisdiction to audit the Federal Reserve.

Grayson pointed out that it was the inspector general’s job to audit such spending and asked again if the office had done any investigation at all.

Coleman’s answer: Not enough yet to even respond. “We are in not a position to say if there losses.”

Grayson concluded, “I am shocked to find out that nobody at the Federal Reserve, including the inspector general, is keeping track of this.”

Meanwhile, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke says the bank is working on ways to rein in the massive balance sheet commitments.

“A majority of the members who made these projections just recently took 2 percent as being an appropriate number” for inflation, Bernanke said Monday.

“Somewhere between 1-1/2 to 2 percent is basically the number that our committee has individually stated is the appropriate medium-term inflation rate.

“To achieve that we need to demonstrate that we will be able to exit from the balance sheet position that we currently have, and have been working on this intensively,” Bernanke said in response to questions after a speech to a conference organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, reported by Reuters.

History Unfolding Before Our Eyes…..

June 5, 2009

Author: Anonymous

I am a student of history. Professionally, I have written 15 books on history that have been published in six languages, and I have studied history all my life. I have come to think there is something monumentally large afoot, and I do not believe it is simply a banking crisis, or a mortgage crisis, or a credit crisis. Yes these exist, but they are merely single facets on a very large gemstone that is only now coming into a sharper focus.

Something of historic proportions is happening. I can sense it because I know how it feels, smells, what it looks like, and how people react to it. Yes, a perfect storm may be brewing, but there is something happening within our country that has been evolving for about ten to fifteen years. The pace has dramatically quickened in the past two.

We demand and then codify into law the requirement that our banks make massive loans to people we know they can never pay back? Why?

We learned just days ago that the Federal Reserve, which has little or no real oversight by anyone, has “loaned” two trillion dollars (that is $2,000,000,000,000) over the past few months, but will not tell us to whom or why or disclose the terms. That is our money. Yours and mine. And that is three times the $700 billion we all argued about so strenuously just this past September. Who has this money? Why do they have it? Why are the terms unavailable to us? Who asked for it? Who authorized it? I thought this was a government of “we the people,” who loaned our powers to our elected leaders. Apparently not.

We have spent two or more decades intentionally de-industrializing our economy. Why?

We have intentionally dumbed down our schools, ignored our history, and no longer teach our founding documents, why we are exceptional, and why we are worth preserving. Students by and large cannot write, think critically, read, or articulate. Parents are not revolting, teachers are not picketing, school boards continue to back mediocrity. Why?

We have now established the precedent of protesting every close election (violently in California over a proposition that is so controversial that it simply wants marriage to remain defined as between one man and one woman. Did you ever think such a thing possible just a decade ago?) We have corrupted our sacred political process by allowing unelected judges to write laws that radically change our way of life, and then mainstream Marxist groups like ACORN and others to turn our voting system into a banana republic. To what purpose?

Now our mortgage industry is collapsing, housing prices are in free fall, major industries are failing, our banking system is on the verge of collapse, social security is nearly bankrupt, as is Medicare and our entire government. Our education system is worse than a joke (I teach college and I know precisely what I am talking about) – the list is staggering in its length, breadth, and depth. It is potentially 1929 x 10. And we are at war with an enemy we cannot even name for fear of offending people of the same religion.  (FoundingFather1776 Notes: It is amazing to me that since his Lordship Obama became President, the media has conveniently “forgotten” about the boondoggle of Iraq and Afghanistan.  The wars were wrong under Bush…..and they are just as wrong under “I-promise-to-get-us-out-if elected” Obama.  Even setting aside the fact that these wars were orchestrated by the Globalists and are a complete fraud – doesn’t ANYONE realize that the $12 billion MONTHLY cost of the Iraq war alone could be better spent here at home!?)

And finally, we have elected a man that no one really knows anything about, who has never run so much as a Dairy Queen!  All of his associations and alliances are with real radicals in their chosen fields of employment and everything we learn about him, drip by drip, is unsettling if not downright scary (Surely you have heard him speak about his idea to create and fund a mandatory civilian defense force stronger than our military for use inside our borders? No? Oh, of course. The media would never play that for you over and over and then demand he answer it.

 

Mr. Obama’s winning platform can be boiled down to one word: Change. Why?

I have never been so afraid for my country and for my children as I am now

This man campaigned on bringing people together, something he has never, ever done in his professional life. In my assessment, Obama will divide us along philosophical lines, push us apart, and then try to realign the pieces into a new and different power structure. Change is indeed coming. And when it comes, you will never see the same nation again.

And that is only the beginning…

As a serious student of history,  I thought I would never come to experience what the ordinary, moral German must have felt in the mid-1930s In those times, the “savior” was a former smooth-talking rabble-rouser from the streets, about whom the average German knew next to nothing. What they should have known was that he was associated with groups that shouted, shoved, and pushed around people with whom they disagreed; he edged his way onto the political stage through great oratory. Conservative “losers” read it right now.

And there were the promises. Economic times were tough, people were losing jobs, and he was a great speaker. And he smiled and frowned and waved a lot. And people, even newspapers, were afraid to speak out for fear that his “brown shirts” would bully and beat them into submission. Which they did – regularly.

And then, he was duly elected to office, while a full-throttled economic crisis bloomed at hand – the Great Depression. Slowly, but surely he seized the controls of government power, person by person, department by department, bureaucracy by bureaucracy. The children of German citizens were at first, encouraged to join a Youth Movement in his name where they were taught exactly what to think. Later, they were required to do so. No Jews of course.

How did he get people on his side? He did it by promising jobs to the jobless, money to the money-less, and rewards for the military-industrial complex. He did it by indoctrinating the children, advocating gun control, health care for all, better wages, better jobs, and promising to re-instill pride once again in the country, across Europe , and across the world. He did it with a compliant media – did you know that? And he did this all in the name of justice and… change. And the people surely got what they voted for.

If you think I am exaggerating, look it up. It’s all there in the history books

So read your history books. Many people of conscience objected in 1933 and were shouted down, called names, laughed at, and ridiculed. When Winston Churchill pointed out the obvious in the late 1930s while seated in the House of Lords in England (he was not yet Prime Minister), he was booed into his seat and called a crazy troublemaker. He was right, though. And the world came to regret that he was not listened to.

Do not forget that Germany was the most educated, the most cultured country in Europe

It was full of music, art, museums, hospitals, laboratories, and universities. And yet, in less than six years (a shorter time span than just two terms of the U. S. presidency) it was rounding up its own citizens, killing others, abrogating its laws, turning children against parents, and neighbors against neighbors. All with the best of intentions, of course. The road to Hell is paved with them.

As a practical thinker, one not overly prone to emotional decisions, I have a choice: I can either believe what the objective pieces of evidence tell me (even if they make me cringe with disgust); I can believe what history is shouting to me from across the chasm of seven decades; or I can hope I am wrong by closing my eyes, having another latte, and ignoring what is transpiring around me..

I choose to believe the evidence. No doubt some people will scoff at me, others laugh, or think I am foolish, naive, or both. To some degree, perhaps I am. But I have never been afraid to look people in the eye and tell them exactly what I believe-and why I believe it.

I pray I am wrong. I do not think I am. Perhaps the only hope is our vote in the next elections.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 49 other followers